Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer

Abstract

BackgroundLaparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is associated with improved recovery and similar cancer outcomes at 3 and 5 years in comparison with open surgery. However, long-term survival rates have rarely been reported. Here, we present survival and recurrence rates of the Dutch patients included in the COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) trial at 10-year follow-up.MethodsBetween March 1997 and March 2003, patients with non-metastatic colon cancer were recruited by 29 hospitals in eight countries and randomised to either laparoscopic or open surgery. Main inclusion criterion for the COLOR trial was solitary adenocarcinoma of the left or right colon. The primary outcome was disease-free survival at 3 years, and secondary outcomes included overall survival and recurrence. The 10-year follow-up data of all Dutch patients were collected. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00387842).ResultsIn total, 1248 patients were randomised, of which 329 were Dutch. Fifty-eight Dutch patients were excluded and 15 were lost to follow-up, leaving 256 patients for 10-year analysis. Median follow-up was 112 months. Disease-free survival rates were 45.2 % in the laparoscopic group and 43.2 % in the open group (difference 2.0 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI) −10.3 to 14.3; p = 0.96). Overall survival rates were 48.4 and 46.7 %, respectively (difference 1.7 %; 95 % CI −10.6 to 14.0; p = 0.83). Stage-specific analysis revealed similar survival rates for both groups. Sixty-two patients were diagnosed with recurrent disease, accounting for 29.4 % in the laparoscopic group and 28.2 % in the open group (difference 1.2 %; 95 % CI −11.1 to 13.5; p = 0.73). Seven patients had port- or wound-site recurrences (laparoscopic n = 3 vs. open n = 4).ConclusionsLaparoscopic surgery for non-metastatic colon cancer is associated with similar rates of disease-free survival, overall survival and recurrences as open surgery at 10-year follow-up.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5270-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Laparoscopic synchronous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: A systematic review

“…Laparoscopic colorectal surgery and laparoscopic liver surgery are both accepted as an appropriate approach for selected patients with colorectal and liver malignancies. Indeed, minimally invasive colorectal resections are routinely performed at most centers, as their safety and efficacy are supported by large randomized controlled trials . Laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) for primary and metastatic liver lesions are also increasingly being performed.…”

Single‐port laparoscopic colectomy in elderly patients with colon cancer: A propensity score‐matched comparison with younger patients

“…In recent decades, there has been an increase in the number of elderly patients with colon cancer worldwide. In many institutions, laparoscopic surgery is the standard treatment for patients with colon cancer because its oncological safety in these patients has been proven in randomized trials . As laparoscopic surgery in colon cancer patients has become more common and its safety and feasibility confirmed, its application range has been expanded to include elderly patients …”

Quality of life after minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer

“…Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) forever changed a breadth of specialties including not only gynecology, urology, and general surgery, but also colorectal surgery [2] . The benefits of MIS are innumerable, including a reduction in pain and narcotic use, shorter length of stay, and earlier return to work compared to conventional open surgery [2,3] . These tremendous improvements in functional outcomes have translated into an improved quality of life.…”