2012
DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i1.12172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tendência genética para pesos padronizados aos 205, 365 e 550 dias de idade de bovinos Nelore da região norte do Brasil

Abstract: Pesquisas efetivas que avaliam a eficiência dos rebanhos bovinos na região Norte do Brasil são insipientes. Por isso, objetivou-se avaliar as mudanças genéticas aditivas diretas e maternais dos pesos padronizados para 205 (P205), 365 (P365) e 550 (P550) dias de idade, de animais da raça Nelore, criados a pasto, nascidos entre 1997 e 2007 na região Norte do Brasil. As estimativas dos componentes de (co)variâncias utilizadas no cálculo dos valores genéticos foram obtidas pelo método de máxima verossimilhança res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
8
1
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
8
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Average birth weights ranged from 29.5 kg to 32.8 kg in previous reports (HOLANDA et al, 2004;MENEZES et al, 2013;ARAÚJO et al, 2014), for Nellore herds in Midwestern and Northeastern Brazil, compared to 37.6 kg in this study. The same was true for the adjusted 120-day weight 138.4 kg, compared to 119.1-129.0 kg in GARNERO et al, 2010;SOUZA et al, 2011), for the adjusted 205-day weight compare Table 1 to SANTOS et al, 2012;AMARAL et al, 2014;ARAÚJO et al, 2014), and for adjusted 365-day and 550-day weights, compare Table 1 with the study by (RIBEIRO et al, 2001;GARNERO et al, 2010).The high birth weight measured in this study might result from the selection criteria adopted for the analysis, which included birth weight in the calculations of adjusted weights at weaning. In addition, the higher 365-day and 550-day weights observed here could be due to the intense selection for weight traits practiced at the ranch, which included periodic culling of animals not meeting performance expectations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Average birth weights ranged from 29.5 kg to 32.8 kg in previous reports (HOLANDA et al, 2004;MENEZES et al, 2013;ARAÚJO et al, 2014), for Nellore herds in Midwestern and Northeastern Brazil, compared to 37.6 kg in this study. The same was true for the adjusted 120-day weight 138.4 kg, compared to 119.1-129.0 kg in GARNERO et al, 2010;SOUZA et al, 2011), for the adjusted 205-day weight compare Table 1 to SANTOS et al, 2012;AMARAL et al, 2014;ARAÚJO et al, 2014), and for adjusted 365-day and 550-day weights, compare Table 1 with the study by (RIBEIRO et al, 2001;GARNERO et al, 2010).The high birth weight measured in this study might result from the selection criteria adopted for the analysis, which included birth weight in the calculations of adjusted weights at weaning. In addition, the higher 365-day and 550-day weights observed here could be due to the intense selection for weight traits practiced at the ranch, which included periodic culling of animals not meeting performance expectations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…On the other hand, the weaning weight at 205 days of age is an important trait in selection programs, because it is an estimate of the milking and mothering abilities of the dam and the growth potential of the calf (MALHADO et al, 2005). In addition, weaning weight is important in production system because preweaning gains have lower costs than postweaning gains (SANTOS et al, 2012). All calf weight traits measured had considerable direct additive genetic variability (Table 2), and thus can be used in breeding programs for selection for birth weight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the non-genetic factors that affect postweaning weight gain are related to the calf sex, year, and season of birth (Silva et al, 2004) and herd and feeding regimen (Santos et al, 2012), as well as, good nutritional management and health of the herd. Considering the environmental correlation between ST and PWG550, the non-additive factors that influence PWG550 should not affect ST, suggesting that the differences in ST between animals may not be affected during the postweaning period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gunawan et al (2011b) considered that this might be partly a correlated response to selection for increased daily gain. A possible cause of the undesirable trend in gestation length and of the marked fluctuation of values observed for AFC, CI, and DO could be the intense selection to increase productive traits (Lopes et al, 2011;Santos et al, 2012;Lopes et al, 2013), without giving attention to reproductive traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%