2022
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine and Baricitinib for Patients at High Risk of Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019: The PANCOVID Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract: Background This study was designed to evaluate if patients with high risk for severe COVID-19 would benefit from treatment with TDF/FTC followed by baricitinib in case of hypoxemia and systemic inflammation. Methods PANCOVID is an open-label, double-randomized, phase 3 pragmatic clinical trial including adults with symptomatic COVID-19 with ≥ 2 comorbidities or older than 60 years conducted between 10 October 2020 and 23 Sept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding author replied yes, they did the blinding strategy to assess the outcome of the work. The similar email was sent to PANCOVID/Montejano [22] but no reply received.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The corresponding author replied yes, they did the blinding strategy to assess the outcome of the work. The similar email was sent to PANCOVID/Montejano [22] but no reply received.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, RECOVERY study contributed the greatest number of participants plus events and the weightage of the study was 90.7% with the remaining weightage of just 8.3% is shared by another 2 small studies in figure 1C. Besides, based on table 1, karampitsakos [21] and PANCOVID/Montejano [22] produced different outcomes where the former mentioned baricitinib statistically reduced mortality while the latter mentioned the opposite. Based on the MA of these 2 studies, baricitinib statistically did not reduce mortality (data not shown) in COVID-19 patients where the RR = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.55 to 1.05; p = 0.1; I 2 = 0%; p = 0.35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 3 randomized trials of TDF–FTC, but none were phase 3 randomized trials for COVID-19 treatment in nonhospitalized patients. A trial in hospitalized patients, funded by Spain's Instituto de Salud Carlos III, found no clinical benefit of TDF–FTC ( 34 ), as expected for antivirals. A phase 2 trial in 60 persons with mild COVID-19, funded by Caen University Hospital in France, found reduced nasopharyngeal shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in the TDF–FTC group ( 35 ).…”
Section: Why Didn't Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Make It Into Random...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, several studies have tried to determine factors associated with acquisition of and clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in people with HIV (PWH). Recent observational studies have suggested a protective effect of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) against acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 [1,2] and severe COVID-19 outcomes [1,3,4], whereas other studies found no benefit of TDF or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in PWH [5,6] or adults without HIV [7,8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study in Lesotho estimated that 94% of treatment-experienced persons with viral loads 80-999 copies/ml harbored drugresistant mutations [6]. Likewise, persistent low-level viremia (50-999 copies/ml over >6 months) has been linked to residual inflammation and subsequent virologic failure [7][8][9]. These findings, coupled with rising levels of HIV-1 drug resistance across Africa, have prompted calls to redefine VLS using lower cutpoints [10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%