37th Annual Symposium on Frequency Control 1983
DOI: 10.1109/freq.1983.200654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile Fracture Strength of ST Cut Quartz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tensile strength of quartz is ca. 150 MPa (Chao & Parker, 1983), similar to that for the San Marcos gabbro with 68% plagioclase (Ai & Ahrens, 2004). Using this value, the maximum differential stress for tensile failure in a quartzo‐feldspathic rock, such as AW9, is ca.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The tensile strength of quartz is ca. 150 MPa (Chao & Parker, 1983), similar to that for the San Marcos gabbro with 68% plagioclase (Ai & Ahrens, 2004). Using this value, the maximum differential stress for tensile failure in a quartzo‐feldspathic rock, such as AW9, is ca.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…When the V-shaped beam thickness is 80 μm, the stress value emerged by the shock in the Z− shock direction is the largest at 94.721 MPa; when the V-shaped beam thickness is 75 μm, the stress value emerged by the shock in the same direction is the largest, at 100.512 MPa. Limited by the fracture strength of quartz crystal materials (95 MPa) [ 27 , 28 ], the minimum thickness of the V-shaped beam is 80 μm.…”
Section: Modeling Simulation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both SAW and FBG sensors are able to monitor between -20 °C and +80 °C, which is an adequate temperature range for most civil engineering applications. While FBG sensors can monitor strains as high as 3 e m [34], SAW sensor strain ranges are limited by the strength of the quartz substrate to 0.5-1 e m with more polished substrates demonstrating higher strengths [19]. For high strain monitoring applications, strength limitations can be overcome through sensor packaging design, as described in section 3.3.…”
Section: Measurement Resolution and Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAW sensors have historically been used to monitor aircraft component cracking [16], rebar corrosion [17], and tyre pressure [18], but their application to strain and displacement monitoring in civil structures, particularly in concrete, has been limited. The reasons for this include the fact that the brittleness of SAW sensors significantly limits their measurement range [19]. There are also challenges associated with bonding the sensors to the non-uniform and low precision geometries of concrete structures [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%