2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile strength of axially loaded unidirectional Nextel 610™ reinforced aluminium: A case study in local load sharing between randomly distributed fibres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the experimental characterization of the mechanical behavior of continuous unidirectional alumina fiber reinforced aluminum that has been reported in the literature has focused on studies of the strength and deformation mechanisms of the composite loaded along the fiber axis. Compressive [23][24], tensile [25][26][27][28], bending [25], and fatigue [29] properties have been reported for loading applied along the fiber axis of unidirectional alumina fiber reinforced aluminum. Hall et al [30] studied the quasi-static and high strain rate properties of cross-ply unidirectional alumina reinforced aluminum MMC and found that the properties were strongly dependent on fiber distribution and alignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the experimental characterization of the mechanical behavior of continuous unidirectional alumina fiber reinforced aluminum that has been reported in the literature has focused on studies of the strength and deformation mechanisms of the composite loaded along the fiber axis. Compressive [23][24], tensile [25][26][27][28], bending [25], and fatigue [29] properties have been reported for loading applied along the fiber axis of unidirectional alumina fiber reinforced aluminum. Hall et al [30] studied the quasi-static and high strain rate properties of cross-ply unidirectional alumina reinforced aluminum MMC and found that the properties were strongly dependent on fiber distribution and alignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9a reveals the fracture surface with some fiber pull-out whilst some amount of fibers did not orient along the extrusion direction and cracked. The probability of composite failure is a function of filament length when loaded under specific stress [32]. As demonstrated by the illustration in Fig.…”
Section: Fracture Behaviormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fiber orientation for a given fiber was determined as follows: (i) Images taken in optical microscopy (VHX-500F CCD camera, which has a resolution of 1600 Â 1200 pixels in size) were preprocessed by the aid of the ImageJ software. (ii) Functions in ImageJ software "Make Binary" and "Watershed" used to get binary photos, then function of "Noise / Remove outlier" [21] employed to get clear boundary carbon fiber images of CF/PA6 and CF/Epoxy laminates as shown in Fig. 5(a) and (b), respectively.…”
Section: Microscope Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a UD composites loaded along its fibers, unless the matrix is brittle, internal damage is in the form of individual broken fibers [21]. The tendency of one broken carbon fiber to cause neighboring carbon fibers break determines the fracture behavior and mechanical properties like tensile strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%