2007
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.091488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tentacle Probes™: Differentiation of Difficult Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Deletions by Presence or Absence of a Signal in Real-Time PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such assays are more sensitive to assay conditions compared with assays relying on unique signature sequences, and the occurrence of false positive signals from B. cereus strains caused by mispriming is more likely. Even though various techniques have been evaluated to enhance the specificity of SNP-based PCR assays (including TaqMan mismatch amplification mutation assay, 23 restriction site insertion-PCR, 56 tentacle or locked nucleic acids probes-based PCR 25 or high resolution melting (HRM)-PCR 53 ), they are neither as robust nor as user friendly as assays based on unique signature sequences. The chromosomal markers BA5345 (Antwerpen), PL3 (Wielinga), or BA5357 (Letant), enable unambiguous identification of B. anthracis strains, including plasmid-cured isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such assays are more sensitive to assay conditions compared with assays relying on unique signature sequences, and the occurrence of false positive signals from B. cereus strains caused by mispriming is more likely. Even though various techniques have been evaluated to enhance the specificity of SNP-based PCR assays (including TaqMan mismatch amplification mutation assay, 23 restriction site insertion-PCR, 56 tentacle or locked nucleic acids probes-based PCR 25 or high resolution melting (HRM)-PCR 53 ), they are neither as robust nor as user friendly as assays based on unique signature sequences. The chromosomal markers BA5345 (Antwerpen), PL3 (Wielinga), or BA5357 (Letant), enable unambiguous identification of B. anthracis strains, including plasmid-cured isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] Finally, a few single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) have also been considered for PCR markers. Target genes include rpoB, 24,[48][49][50][51] gyrA, 25,52,53 gyrB, 54,55 plc, 20,23,53,56 purA, 57 and the 16S-23S rDNA internal spacer sequences. [58][59][60] But, so far, only the nonsense mutation in the global regulator PlcR, which controls the transcription of secreted virulence factors in B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, have proved to be truly unique to B. anthracis strains.…”
Section: Literature Survey Of Pcr-based Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assays that have performed very well under highly controlled laboratory conditions sometimes fail under more routine conditions. 22 Large melting curve differentials provide robustness in the presence of variances in test conditions, such as salt, template concentrations, and temperature variations. Because each of these parameters affects the melting curves of the probe-target hybrid, they can potentially lead to false positives and negatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although assays like PCR have expected concentration limits based on primer concentration, Taqman-MGB probes have failed when exposed to high concentrations of variant. 22 In general, assays relying on PCR mask potential concentration dependence problems in probe technologies because, if target is present, it is typically amplified to levels near the primer concentration. In most cases, the one to two orders of magnitude of concentrations where accuracy is achieved by existing probes is sufficient for PCR reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%