1994
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1779-1782.1994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tentative evidence of AIDS-associated biotype of Mycobacterium kansasii

Abstract: Previous studies revealed heterogeneous behavior within the species Mycobacterium kansasii against commercially available DNA probes (Accuprobe M. kansasii culture identification test; Gen-Probe); several isolates, conventionally identified as M. kansasii, failed in fact to hybridize. Looking for a possible association with phenotypic features, we tested a fully characterized panel of 69 clinical isolates of M. kansasii (19 of which were Accuprobe negative) with a semiquantitative micromethod which tests for 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high rate of isolation of Accuprobe-negative strains previously reported in Europe (12,26,33) was confirmed by our study, which shows that the frequency of Accuprobe-negative M. kansasii strains is high in France.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high rate of isolation of Accuprobe-negative strains previously reported in Europe (12,26,33) was confirmed by our study, which shows that the frequency of Accuprobe-negative M. kansasii strains is high in France.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Conventional biochemical tests could not distinguish between the two groups. The commercially available identification probe (Accuprobe; Gen-Probe Inc.) fails to hybridize with the subspecies isolates (12,21,26,33), whereas a specific DNA probe isolated in plasmid p6123 successfully hybridized with M. kansasii isolates, including the genetic subgroup (33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a continuing debate on how the differences between M. kansasii subtypes translate into pathogenicity. The prevailing view is that only types I and II are true human pathogens, with the latter having been associated with immunodeficiency, and HIV infection in particular, whereas all the remaining types are considered non-pathogenic, and their sporadic isolation from clinical samples has been interpreted as colonization or environmental contamination (Tortoli et al, 1994;Taillard et al, 2003). Indeed, M. kansasii type I is the most commonly detected among clinical isolates and the predominant cause of M. kansasii disease worldwide (Alcaide et al, 1997;Kim et al, 2001;Gaafar et al, 2003;Santin and Alcaide, 2003;Taillard et al, 2003;Zhang et al, 2004;da Silva Telles et al, 2005;Shitrit et al, 2006;Thomson et al, 2014;Kwenda et al, 2015;Bakuła et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, five subtypes have been identified by genotyping of the 16S−23S intergenic spacer region [28]. With some overlap, mainly in genotype MKA‐II, which has been associated with infection in immunosuppressed or AIDS patients [29,30], clinical and environmental isolates are distinct genotypically, which suggests phenotypic differences that determine the ability to cause disease in humans. Genotype MKA‐I is the most common type found among clinical isolates [28,30] and has been isolated only rarely from the environment (unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%