2014
DOI: 10.1257/aer.104.1.323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Term Premia and Inflation Uncertainty: Empirical Evidence from an International Panel Dataset: Comment

Abstract: Term premia implied by maximum likelihood estimates of affine term structure models are misleading because of small-sample bias. We show that accounting for this bias alters the conclusions about the trend, cycle, and macroeconomic determinants of the term premia estimated in Wright (2011). His term premium estimates are essentially acyclical, and often just parallel the secular trend in long-term interest rates. In contrast, bias-corrected term premia show pronounced countercyclical behavior, consistent with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
80
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
80
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this approach is also based on the I(0)/I(1) dichotomy, not taking into account fractional alternatives. Interestingly, and despite the clear methodological differences, our estimated term premium displays quite similar countercyclical dynamics to the ones derived by Jardet, Monfort, andPegoraro (2011) andWu (2012a).…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, this approach is also based on the I(0)/I(1) dichotomy, not taking into account fractional alternatives. Interestingly, and despite the clear methodological differences, our estimated term premium displays quite similar countercyclical dynamics to the ones derived by Jardet, Monfort, andPegoraro (2011) andWu (2012a).…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, the term premium, as the residual component, has to account for the trend in the long-term interest rate since the 1980s. As argued by Kim and Orphanides (2012) and Bauer et al (2014), such behavior of expectations and term premium components appears at odds with observed trends in survey-based expectations (Kozicki and Tinsley, 2001) and the cyclical behavior of risk premiums in asset prices (Fama and French, 1989).…”
Section: The Term Premium In Long-term Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The resulting empirical decomposition of long-term rates into expectations and term premium components starkly contrasts with that from a conventional yield-curve model in which yield factors follow a stationary VAR(1). The conventional decomposition implies an implausibly stable expectations component and attributes most of the secular decline in interest rates to the residual term premium, as discussed in critiques by Kim and Orphanides (2012) and Bauer et al (2014). Our decomposition instead attributes the majority of the secular decline to the decrease in i * t .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To address this problem, one can take advantage of the information in the cross section of interest rates with plausible restrictions on risk pricing, as in Bauer (2016) and JPS, or directly adjust for the small-sample bias, as in Bauer et al (2012).…”
Section: Empirical Spanned and Unspanned Mtsmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, unspanned models may be a useful shortcut in practical applications of MTSMs. 42 We emphasize, however, that these models are not needed to match the regression evidence that is usually cited to justify their use and 40 Bauer et al (2012) and Bauer et al (2014) also discuss the countercyclical behavior of term premia estimated from term structure models.…”
Section: Term Premia In Spanned and Unspanned Mtsmsmentioning
confidence: 99%