2015
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-73562015005000001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terminal Pleistocene Lithic Technology and Use of Space in Central Chile

Abstract: We synthesize lithic evidence from terminal Pleistocene sites in Central Chile (~31-34º S). Quebrada Santa Julia, Valiente, Taguatagua 1 and Taguatagua 2 sites show diverse assemblages, which are not fully understood by a traditional typological approach. This diversity can be better explained due to variations in discard rates, raw material availability, and site function. This approach allows the consideration of early hunter-gatherer occupations as integrated segments of a two-stage evolving use of space/mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At a local scale, the basal date of Valiente does not statistically overlap the age of Quebrada Santa Julia; yet they are within the confident range attributable to penecontemporaneous occupations [33]. Despite the differences between these sites, Quebrada Santa Julia being a brief stay campsite where crystal quartz was an exotic toolstone and Valiente a quarry/workshop where the initial stages of procurement and manufacture were carried out, some observations on technological behaviors suggest they should be regarded as integrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At a local scale, the basal date of Valiente does not statistically overlap the age of Quebrada Santa Julia; yet they are within the confident range attributable to penecontemporaneous occupations [33]. Despite the differences between these sites, Quebrada Santa Julia being a brief stay campsite where crystal quartz was an exotic toolstone and Valiente a quarry/workshop where the initial stages of procurement and manufacture were carried out, some observations on technological behaviors suggest they should be regarded as integrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A confident occupational range between 11,720–11,210 cal BP indicates it is contemporaneous with the latest chronological range of Valiente [33]. However, Taguatagua 2 record is remarkably different, given that is characterized by a series of ordered piles of bones of the incomplete remains of at least nine butchered gomphotheres along with few finished tools and with no indication of local lithic production [33, 45, 92]. Yet, in the case of Taguatagua 2, crystal quartz fishtail points were recorded either broken (N = 1) or in their finished state (N = 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predominance of small artifacts derived from rhyodacitic and dacitic vitreous pebbles and cobbles could be related to the rock quality, the informal knapping, and their abandonment in this nonresidential site. In the research of early South American sites, artifacts of reduced size appear rather frequently (Bueno, Schmidt Dias, & Steele, ; Collins, ; López, ; Méndez & Jackson, ; Núñez et al, ). The angles of the edges of simple or marginally retouched edge‐trimmed flake tools produce appropriate blades to make cuts or precise incisions, or to scrape (with wider angles; Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The late Pleistocene peopling of South America, from the time of their entrance through the Bering Strait until arrival in Patagonia, has become one of the most challenging research questions in the field of human sciences (Anderson, ; Dillehay, and references therein). South American archeology has made important contributions studying the relationship between humans and their natural environment, especially at the beginning of the population on the continent (Aceituno, Loaiza, Delgado‐Burbano, & Barrientos, ; Borrero, ; Brook, Mancini, Franco, Bamonte, & Ambrústolo, ; Bryan & Gruhn, ; Dillehay, , , , ; López, ; Méndez & Jackson, ; Miotti & Salemme, ). One of the approaches for understanding this relationship is the study of lithic artifacts combining morphotechnological analyses with the identification of sources for raw materials (e.g., Giesso, Berón, & Glascock, ; Seelenfreund et al, ; Stern, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%