2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6955-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Termination of Eukaryotic Replication Forks

Abstract: Termination of DNA replication forks takes place when two replication forks coming from neighbouring origins meet each other usually in the midpoint of the replicon. At this stage, the remaining fragments of DNA have to be unwound, all remaining DNA replicated and newly synthesised strands ligated to produce continuous sister chromatids. Finally, the replication machinery has to be taken off, chromatin re-assembled, and entwisted sister chromatids resolved topologically.Over the last few decades, we have learn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(173 reference statements)
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This does not mean that the fusion of forks is unproblematic in eukaryotic cells. On the contrary, recent work has highlighted that replisome disassembly is highly choreographed and that multiple accessory proteins, such as the helicases Rrm3 and Pif1, are necessary for bringing replication to an accurate conclusion (Steinacher et al, 2012;Maric et al, 2014;Moreno et al, 2014;Dewar et al, 2015;Moreno and Gambus, 2015;Dewar and Walter, 2017;Gambus, 2017;Deegan et al, 2019), highlighting that we have only just started to understand the mechanisms and regulation of fork fusion events both in bacteria and eukaryotes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This does not mean that the fusion of forks is unproblematic in eukaryotic cells. On the contrary, recent work has highlighted that replisome disassembly is highly choreographed and that multiple accessory proteins, such as the helicases Rrm3 and Pif1, are necessary for bringing replication to an accurate conclusion (Steinacher et al, 2012;Maric et al, 2014;Moreno et al, 2014;Dewar et al, 2015;Moreno and Gambus, 2015;Dewar and Walter, 2017;Gambus, 2017;Deegan et al, 2019), highlighting that we have only just started to understand the mechanisms and regulation of fork fusion events both in bacteria and eukaryotes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, no specific termination-related pause sites have been identified in eukaryotes and archaea, even though multiple replication origins per chromosome result in a much higher number of fork fusions. It appears that replication effectively terminates at random locations between origins (Duggin et al, 2011;Hawkins et al, 2013;Samson et al, 2013;Gambus, 2017).…”
Section: The Termination Area In Escherichia Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important, because displacement of CMG from DNA blocks fork progression irreversibly ( Labib et al, 2000 ), since CMG cannot be reassembled at a replication fork during S-phase. Nonetheless, the convergence of two replication forks leads very quickly to CMG disassembly and replisome dissolution ( Dewar and Walter, 2017 ; Gambus, 2017 ), which is likely to represent the final stage of DNA replication termination. Consistent with this view, CMG unloading occurs after the formation of a fully ligated DNA product during plasmid replication in Xenopus laevis egg extracts ( Dewar et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In E. coli and B. subtilis, the location of fork fusion is restricted to the centre of the terminus region by several replication pause sites (explained further below). In contrast, in diverse eukaryotes and archaea that have multiple replication origins per chromosome, fork fusion does not appear to be controlled by specific pause sites in many cases and instead occurs at random sites within fork fusion zones between origins (Duggin et al, 2011;Gambus, 2017;Hawkins et al, 2013;Samson et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%