2021
DOI: 10.2147/copd.s335742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terms and Definitions Used to Describe Recurrence, Treatment Failure and Recovery of Acute Exacerbations of COPD: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

Abstract: Introduction Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs) are important clinical events, with many patients experiencing multiple AECOPDs annually. The terms used in the literature to define recurring AECOPD events are inconsistent and may impact the ability to describe the true burden of these events. We undertook a systematic review to identify and summarize terms and definitions used in observational studies to describe AECOPD-related events occurring after an initial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive pressure support was more frequently required in SARS-CoV-2 AECOPD compared with non-SARS-CoV-2 infective AECOPD and NI-COPD (18.5% and 11.7% vs. 7.5%, respectively). Despite similar age, CCI and frailty scores, patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 AECOPD had longer hospitalisation stays (median 7 [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] days vs. 5 [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and 4 [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]) and increased 30-day mortality (16.9% vs. 11.1% and 5.9%) than those with non-SARS-CoV-2 infective AECOPD or NI-COPD, respectively (Table 1, Figure 1, Supplementary Data 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Positive pressure support was more frequently required in SARS-CoV-2 AECOPD compared with non-SARS-CoV-2 infective AECOPD and NI-COPD (18.5% and 11.7% vs. 7.5%, respectively). Despite similar age, CCI and frailty scores, patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 AECOPD had longer hospitalisation stays (median 7 [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] days vs. 5 [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and 4 [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]) and increased 30-day mortality (16.9% vs. 11.1% and 5.9%) than those with non-SARS-CoV-2 infective AECOPD or NI-COPD, respectively (Table 1, Figure 1, Supplementary Data 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) lead to increased healthcare utilisation, reduced health-related quality of life and accelerated loss of lung function, with severe exacerbations increasing the risk of death. 2 Viral infections are the commonest cause of AECOPD, though there can also be bacterial, non-infective or combined triggers. 3 Viral AECOPD cause more prolonged symptoms and longer hospital stays 4 than non-viral exacerbations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant airway inflammation, mucus secretion and gas trapping, and even systemic inflammation are present during AECOPD compared to the stable phase [60,61]. Frequent AECOPD events can significantly reduce pulmonary function, affect quality of life, and increase the risk of death of patients [62]. With AECOPD, the medications used in the stable phase are no longer applicable for the clinical management of patients, and therefore, the 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) document defines AECOPD as "an acute worsening of respiratory symptoms 13 Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine that leads to additional treatment" [63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms used in scientific literature to describe an acute, chronic, and recurring disease can sometimes be inconsistent. The need to clarify this issue has been attempted in several studies for other diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 6 , traumas in orthopaedic field 7 , surveillance-based studies of sports injuries 8 , with the aim of gaining a formal consensus on terminology.…”
Section: Scope and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%