Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2000 (Cat. No.00TH8511)
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2000.898363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terrain perception for DEMO III

Abstract: The Demo III program has as its primary focus the development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obstacles are given a clearance which is wider than the clearance afforded by extreme routes. When clearance is not available, the algorithm plans at slower speeds [9]. Sandstorm and H1ghlander, robots developed for desert racing, have driven extreme routes at speeds up to 15 meters per second by planning in a series of grids along the original path and smoothing the result [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obstacles are given a clearance which is wider than the clearance afforded by extreme routes. When clearance is not available, the algorithm plans at slower speeds [9]. Sandstorm and H1ghlander, robots developed for desert racing, have driven extreme routes at speeds up to 15 meters per second by planning in a series of grids along the original path and smoothing the result [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are compared against a prior obstacle detection technique [Bellutta00] that used slope measurements along image columns and 2-D area measures for obstacle detection. As mentioned earlier, this prior technique is not expected to work well on terrain that contains obstacles that slope along the image plane, rather than vertically downwards along image columns.…”
Section: -D Obstacle Detection: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our new rule-based 3-D shape reasoning and classification is expected to outperform prior 2-D based obstacle reasoning methods [Bellutta00] that used 2-D area information (not 3-D geometrical measures) to reject smallsized false obstacles. In many cases, an object that occupies a small number of pixels in the 2-D image does not imply the presence of a false obstacle, or conversely a camera could occupy a large number of pixels, and true obstacles far away from the camera could occupy a significantly small area.…”
Section: -D Shape Reasoning For Obstacle Classification Using Rule-bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations