Der Lange Schatten Des Antisemitismus 2013
DOI: 10.14220/9783737001458.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terror gegen Tandler. Kontext und Chronik der antisemitischen Attacken am I. Anatomischen Institut der Universität Wien, 1910 bis 1933

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…very well how different notions of the ‚norm' and the body were being contested in various social, political, and scientific camps of the city when Pernkopf started his atlas project. With his atlas, Tandler promoted a practical-utilitarian approach that challenged the theoreticalanalytical approach of the German scientific community [143][144][145]. Growing ideological segregation at the medical faculty had made Tandler's professorship a meeting point of Jewish and Social Democrat students; these were regarded as the enemy by German National and Catholic Conservative groups, which were exactly the groups that Hochstetter was promoting at his analytic-descriptive Chair [143,[145][146][147].…”
Section: Tandler's Anatomical Textbookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…very well how different notions of the ‚norm' and the body were being contested in various social, political, and scientific camps of the city when Pernkopf started his atlas project. With his atlas, Tandler promoted a practical-utilitarian approach that challenged the theoreticalanalytical approach of the German scientific community [143][144][145]. Growing ideological segregation at the medical faculty had made Tandler's professorship a meeting point of Jewish and Social Democrat students; these were regarded as the enemy by German National and Catholic Conservative groups, which were exactly the groups that Hochstetter was promoting at his analytic-descriptive Chair [143,[145][146][147].…”
Section: Tandler's Anatomical Textbookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With his atlas, Tandler promoted a practical-utilitarian approach that challenged the theoreticalanalytical approach of the German scientific community [143][144][145]. Growing ideological segregation at the medical faculty had made Tandler's professorship a meeting point of Jewish and Social Democrat students; these were regarded as the enemy by German National and Catholic Conservative groups, which were exactly the groups that Hochstetter was promoting at his analytic-descriptive Chair [143,[145][146][147]. With his atlas Tandler promoted a restructuring within the borders of the First Austrian Republic and the integration of students from the former crown lands; while Hochstetter promoted an affiliation with the German Reich.…”
Section: Tandler's Anatomical Textbookmentioning
confidence: 99%