2014
DOI: 10.3390/w6051300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tertiary Denitrification of the Secondary Effluent by Denitrifying Biofilters Packed with Different Sizes of Quartz Sand

Abstract: Tertiary denitrification of the secondary effluent in wastewater treatment plants is necessary to control the eutrophication of receiving water bodies. Two denitrifying biofilters (DNBF), one packed with quart sand with sizes of 2-4 mm (DNBF S ) and the other of 4-6 mm (DNBF L ), were operated for tertiary denitrification under empty bed retention times (EBRTs) of 30 min, 15 min and 7.5 min, respectively. Under EBRTs of 30 min, 15 min and 7.5 min, the NO 3 − -N removal percentages were 93%, 82% and 83% in DNBF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers and engineers working on DNFs have primarily focused on whether treated wastewater meets the total nitrogen discharge requirements and how to optimize the operation of DNFs to decrease the dissolved inorganic nitrogen. 23,52,53 Concern is rarely paid to the removal of DON during the DNF process and its impact on the receiving water systems. Optimizing external carbon addition not only improves the NDF process efficiency but also saves chemical costs and reduces secondary pollution (e.g., COD).…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers and engineers working on DNFs have primarily focused on whether treated wastewater meets the total nitrogen discharge requirements and how to optimize the operation of DNFs to decrease the dissolved inorganic nitrogen. 23,52,53 Concern is rarely paid to the removal of DON during the DNF process and its impact on the receiving water systems. Optimizing external carbon addition not only improves the NDF process efficiency but also saves chemical costs and reduces secondary pollution (e.g., COD).…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of both DNBFs was stable within each backwashing cycle, with the NO3 − -N removal percentage variation within 5%. Better denitrification was achieved in DNBFS but with a decreased flow rate during the operation [19].…”
Section: The Main Contribution Of This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 92%
“…In biofilter systems, the size of the filter media affects the system performance with smaller diameter media achieving better the nutrient removal efficiency [18]. Two denitrifying biofilters (DNBF), one packed with quart sand with sizes of 2-4 mm (DNBFS) and the other of 4-6 mm (DNBFL), were studied for tertiary denitrification under empty bed retention times (EBRTs) of 30 min, 15 min, and 7.5 min [19]. Using these times of operation, the percentages of NO3 − -N removal were 93%, 82% and 83% in DNBFS biofilter, and 92%, 68% and 36% in DNBFL one, respectively.…”
Section: The Main Contribution Of This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As secondary effluent has low turbidity and is oligotrophic, biofiltration processes are often selected as the first option for advanced treatment. Currently, ceramsite grains, granular activated carbon, and quartz sand (Jing et al 2012;Ismail and Toshihiko 2012;Wei et al 2014) are widely used as packing materials for biofilters in conventional denitrification processes. Typically, secondary effluent from WWTPs is severely limited in organic carbon, and thus, an external soluble carbon source (e.g., acetic acid, sodium acetate, glucose, ethanol, and methanol) is often added to achieve denitrification (Strong et al 2011;Chu and Wang 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%