“…Any discussion of effective test interpretation is problematic because there is no consensus regarding the nature of the process. Numerous accounts of styles of test interpretation exist (e.g., Bixler & Bixler, 1946;Callis, Polmantier, & Roeber, 1955;Darley & Hagenah, 1955;Stephenson, 1963;Super, 1949;Williamson, 1939), but no substantial empirical data show one method of interpreting tests as more effective than any other. Generally, efforts to describe styles or models of test interpretation have not been profitable and may have tended to further isolate the test interpretation process from counseling.…”