2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.101.102301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test of Isospin Symmetry via Low-EnergyH1(π,π0)nCharge Exchange

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22,23], which are incompatible with the modern pionic-atom data. Independent constraints from experiment are provided by low-energy πN cross sections, including more recent data on both the elastic reactions [47][48][49] and the charge exchange [50][51][52][53], and a global analysis of low-energy data in the Roy-Steiner framework leads to σ πN = 58 (5) MeV [37], in perfect agreement with the pionic-atom result. In contrast, so far lattice QCD calculations [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] have favored low values σ πN ≈ 40 MeV (with the exception of Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…[22,23], which are incompatible with the modern pionic-atom data. Independent constraints from experiment are provided by low-energy πN cross sections, including more recent data on both the elastic reactions [47][48][49] and the charge exchange [50][51][52][53], and a global analysis of low-energy data in the Roy-Steiner framework leads to σ πN = 58 (5) MeV [37], in perfect agreement with the pionic-atom result. In contrast, so far lattice QCD calculations [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] have favored low values σ πN ≈ 40 MeV (with the exception of Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Our uncertainty estimates, derived from the Hessian at the fit minimum, do not produce the very large O(1) uncertainties as observed in the GW fit. However, especially for the charge-exchange reaction, some normalizations still carry sizable uncertainties, which may be related to inconsistencies in the data base or underestimated experimental 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 errors already noticed in [68,69].…”
Section: Page 8 Of 17 Author Submitted Manuscript -Jphysg-101976r3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as observed in the GW fit. However, especially for the charge-exchange reaction, some normalizations still carry sizable uncertainties, which may be related to inconsistencies in the data base or underestimated experimental errors already noticed in [68,69].…”
Section: Fit To the Pion-nucleon Data Basementioning
confidence: 99%