1996
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(96)01742-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test procedures for verification of an electron pencil beam algorithm implemented for treatment planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deviations were mainly found in the build-up region. For small electron fields, the complex scattering process from the electron applicator is underestimated using this dose planning system in the penumbra region (33). The deviations found were in accordance with the results in the present study and indicate an uncertainty in the calculated dose near the surface of the phantom and in the abutment region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The deviations were mainly found in the build-up region. For small electron fields, the complex scattering process from the electron applicator is underestimated using this dose planning system in the penumbra region (33). The deviations found were in accordance with the results in the present study and indicate an uncertainty in the calculated dose near the surface of the phantom and in the abutment region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The performance of the specific treatment planning system used in this study have recently been tested for single photon and electron beams (32,33). Using a similar photon beam as in this study, only small differences were found when calculated depth dose curves and dose profiles were compared with diode measurements (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2b), differences of up to 5% were found, and the corresponding penumbra widths also differed significantly, 3.7 mm ( Table 2). Similar deviations have also been reported elsewhere (14) and can be explained by the way the TPS handles the lateral scatter of the electrons outside the primary beam. However, these discrepancies (best seen in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The electron algorithm of TMS is based on Monte Carlo pre-calculated pencil beams (23,24). Good agreement between these calculations and measurements has been shown in cases relevant to this work (25). For photons, the pencil-beam dose calculation algorithm was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%