2021
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test–retest reliability and validity of body composition methods in adults

Abstract: Cost-effective and efficient body composition measurement devices that are reliable and valid are necessary for identifying health risk as well as for understanding the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of three body composition measurement devices. Forty-nine adults (mean age (SD) = 31.5 (10.7) y; BMI = 23.5 (3.0) kg/m 2 ) completed a reference air displacement plethysmography (ADP) measure, and duplicate measures usi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These contrasting results may be attributed to sample characteristics, as Smith‐Ryan et al's sample was comprised of slightly older, overweight/obese adults when compared to the current study. Additionally, no significant mean differences in %Fat were observed between a similar seven‐site SKF‐based, ultrasound protocol and an ADP criterion (mean difference of −0.32%Fat, p = 0.99), with similar correlation and SEE ( r = 0.85 SEE = 3.86%) as observed in the current study (Totosy de Zepetnek et al, 2021). Despite some contrasting results, the tendency of ultrasound to underestimate %Fat when compared to criterion standards reported in previous research aligns with the results of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These contrasting results may be attributed to sample characteristics, as Smith‐Ryan et al's sample was comprised of slightly older, overweight/obese adults when compared to the current study. Additionally, no significant mean differences in %Fat were observed between a similar seven‐site SKF‐based, ultrasound protocol and an ADP criterion (mean difference of −0.32%Fat, p = 0.99), with similar correlation and SEE ( r = 0.85 SEE = 3.86%) as observed in the current study (Totosy de Zepetnek et al, 2021). Despite some contrasting results, the tendency of ultrasound to underestimate %Fat when compared to criterion standards reported in previous research aligns with the results of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The participants were instructed to be in minimal clothing for the skinfold measurement. The fat percentage was estimated from the sum of seven skinfolds using calibrated Lange callipers (Beta Technology Inc, Cambridge, Maryland) [ 18 ]. The calibration was done using a 25 mm calibration block before each individual’s measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scanner provided values for body geometrics including lengths, circumferences, areas, and volumes of the limbs, trunk and head. The Fit3D ProScanner's utility to produce body volume and composition metrics has been previously validated against a gold standard of Air Displacement Plethysmography (ADP) ( 9 ). Using data from the Fit3D, a body shape index (ABSI), surface-based body shape index (SBSI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WtHR) were calculated for each participant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two alternatives to the DEXA apparatus are 3D body scanning and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) technologies. Both of these modalities are of comparable accuracy ( 9 , 10 ), less invasive, less expensive, require less training and credentials to operate while providing instantaneous results. However, the utility of such low-cost and non-invasive technologies for predicting conditions such as dyslipidemia has not been adequately explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%