2017
DOI: 10.1121/1.4983081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test–retest repeatability of human speech biomarkers from static and real-time dynamic magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: Static anatomical and real-time dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (RT-MRI) of the upper airway is a valuable method for studying speech production in research and clinical settings. The test-retest repeatability of quantitative imaging biomarkers is an important parameter, since it limits the effect sizes and intragroup differences that can be studied. Therefore, this study aims to present a framework for determining the test-retest repeatability of quantitative speech biomarkers from static MRI and RT-MRI, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been occasions in which ICC(1,1) and ICC(3,1) have been explicitly employed at times in the literature. For example, ICC(1,1) has been applied to brain networks based on resting‐state fMRI data (Wang et al, ), to functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data (e.g., Bhambhani, Maikala, Farag, & Rowland, ; Plichta et al, ; Tian et al, ; Zhang et al, ), and to resting‐state data at the whole‐brain level (Zuo et al, ), and to task‐related data through LME at the regional level (Töger et al, ). However, we note that in a large number of publications, the adoption of the ICC type was neither explicitly explained nor justified, which makes precise interpretation difficult.…”
Section: Literature Survey Of Icc For Neuroimagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been occasions in which ICC(1,1) and ICC(3,1) have been explicitly employed at times in the literature. For example, ICC(1,1) has been applied to brain networks based on resting‐state fMRI data (Wang et al, ), to functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data (e.g., Bhambhani, Maikala, Farag, & Rowland, ; Plichta et al, ; Tian et al, ; Zhang et al, ), and to resting‐state data at the whole‐brain level (Zuo et al, ), and to task‐related data through LME at the regional level (Töger et al, ). However, we note that in a large number of publications, the adoption of the ICC type was neither explicitly explained nor justified, which makes precise interpretation difficult.…”
Section: Literature Survey Of Icc For Neuroimagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic rtMRI data were collected during production of running speech from eight healthy volunteers (4F/4M, age: 28.3 ± 4.3). The details of the experimental protocol used can be found in [15]. All imaging was performed on a GE Signa Excite 1.5T scanner with a custom eight-channel upper airway coil [1].…”
Section: Data and Label Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconstruction was performed using the Berkeley Advanced Reconstruction Toolbox (BART) [11]. The MRI sequence and experiment protocol was previously reported ( [9], §2).…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) have achieved a balance among the competing factors of temporal resolution, spatial resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio that allows for the characterization of vocal tract shaping during speech production [7,8]. Alongside these advances in acquisition and reconstruction have grown computational approaches to extract quantitative imaging biomarkers from rtMRI [9]. Increasingly complex computational methods promise to provide * now at Lund University biomarkers of articulatory strategies [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%