1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0047-2727(98)00053-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testable restrictions of Pareto optimal public good provision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Snyder (1999) derives testable restrictions of a model of efficient public good provision on aggregate-level variables and individual income. Once again restrictions exist though key individual data remain unobserved.…”
Section: Testable Restrictions On Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Snyder (1999) derives testable restrictions of a model of efficient public good provision on aggregate-level variables and individual income. Once again restrictions exist though key individual data remain unobserved.…”
Section: Testable Restrictions On Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, anomalies found in the predictions of the theory could be explained by changes in the fundamentals. In the cases of Brown and Matzkin (1996), Snyder (1999) or Carvajal (2003a) it is assumed that preferences do not depend on income. With the previous conditions only, no analogous independence would hold here: for different observed profiles of endowments, ω and ω , marginal distributions for U, π ω (·, S −1 + ) and π ω (·, S −1 + ), which ought to be an invariant fundamental, may differ.…”
Section: Random Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Building on Afriat (1967) they derive testable restrictions on the equilibrium manifold 1 introduced by Balasko (1975). Various extensions of the Brown and Matzkin framework have been developed by Kubler (2003) for expected utility, Snyder (1999) for public goods and Carvajal (2004) for random preferences [see also Carvajal, Ray andSnyder (2004), or Chiappori et al (2004)]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when the asset market is incomplete, Geanakoplos and Polemarchakis (1990) showed that the utility function of an individual can be identified from his demand function for commodities and assets; recently, Kübler et al (2002) extended the argument to show that every individual utility can be obtained from aggregate demand or the graph of the equilibrium correspondence as the allocation of endowments varies. For economies with a public good, Snyder (1999) obtained results concerning restrictions on the market behavior of optimizing individuals, but Carvajal (2002) showed that the results do not generalize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%