2015
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-85292015000100001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testando a cultura de clube dos BRICS: a evolução de um novo banco de desenvolvimento

Abstract: IntroduçãoOs países BRICS realizaram um progresso significativo para consolidar as conexões institucionais entre os membros do grupo através da criação do Novo Banco de Desenvolvimento (NBD) dos BRICS. Dado que esta iniciativa foi primeiramente trazida à tona pela Índia, no contexto da Cúpula dos BRICS em Nova Délhi em 2011, havia ceticismo a respeito da capacidade dos Estados-membros dos BRICS entregarem a proposta, não somente devido a suas diferenças mais amplas nos interesses estratégicos, mas também por

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mistrust and frustration of the rising powers with institutions and processes dominated by the North contributed to their establishing their own multilateral institutions and processes. These range from collaborative processes, such as the India-Brazil-South Africa Intergovernmental Forum (IBSA) established in 2003 and the latest Southern Think-Tanks (NeST) academic network, to major institutions such as the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), led by China (Constantine and Shankland 2017;Oliveira, Onuki, and Oliveira 2006;Becard, Barros-Platiau, and Oliveira 2015;Panova 2015;Cooper and Farooq 2015).…”
Section: St Century: New Agendas the Re-emergence Of Ssc And The Frag...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mistrust and frustration of the rising powers with institutions and processes dominated by the North contributed to their establishing their own multilateral institutions and processes. These range from collaborative processes, such as the India-Brazil-South Africa Intergovernmental Forum (IBSA) established in 2003 and the latest Southern Think-Tanks (NeST) academic network, to major institutions such as the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), led by China (Constantine and Shankland 2017;Oliveira, Onuki, and Oliveira 2006;Becard, Barros-Platiau, and Oliveira 2015;Panova 2015;Cooper and Farooq 2015).…”
Section: St Century: New Agendas the Re-emergence Of Ssc And The Frag...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O NBD iniciou suas atividades com um capital de US$ 50 bilhões, com uma reserva de US$ 100 bilhões para lidar com qualquer crise financeira que possa acontecer futuramente. Os recursos destinados para o ACR foram, portanto, de US$ 100 bilhões, quanto à sua estrutura institucional, o Brasil ficou responsável pelo conselho de administração, a Rússia pelo conselho de governadores, a Índia pela presidência, e a China ficou com a sede do banco, com sede regional na África do Sul (AQUINO; DALDE-GAN, 2014;COOPER;FAROOQ, 2015).…”
Section: Brics (Brasil Rússia íNdia China E áFrica Do Sul)unclassified
“…At the same time, the absence of a binding common agreement, which obliges governments to converge their actions around certain issues, allows the "BRICS agenda" to be modified according to the opportunities of governments at the particular moment in which the summit meetings take place. In this sense, points of disagreement are circumvented, inhibiting conflict between BRICS countries, and the points of agreement are highlighted (Jesus, 2013, Abdenur, 2014, Cooper & Farooq, 2015. However, this form of cooperation means that the permanence of the BRICS depends on the relevance attributed to it by the respective governments in their foreign policy agendas.…”
Section: The Brics Trajectory: From Institutional Construction To Curmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an institutionalist language, Cooper (2014) and Cooper & Farooq (2015) discard that BRICS seeks to compete with the G20, arguing that it behaves like a lobby group that seeks to promote its interests within the scope of this arrangement. According to the authors, the BRICS is not yet constituted as a forum capable of articulating, autonomously, its agency power in international relations.…”
Section: Unraveling the Brics: Revisiting Theoretical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%