Testes de força e resistência muscular: confiabilidade e predição de uma repetição máxima - Revisão e novas evidências

Strength ratio between agonist and antagonist muscles provides significant information about muscular equilibrium, which helps to detect musculoskeletal changes and to guide preventive and rehabilitation programs. Isokinetic dynamometry provides reliable values for muscle torque and subsequently on the force ratio between knee flexors and extensors. However, this method is not clinically accessible. A possible alternative to evaluate this force is the One-Repetition Maximum test (One-Rep Max or just 1-RM), which is the most commonly used test for dynamic force assessment. However, there is no report in the literature of the use of 1-RM test for the quantification of knee flexors and extensors ratio. For this reason, the objective of this study was to use the 1-RM test to measure the ratio between knee extensors and flexors in young adults in order to find reference values. The studied sample was composed of 80 young adults (40 men and 40 women), mean age of 22.21 (±3.58) years with no musculoskeletal injuries. They were submitted to the following procedure: IPAQ-short version, weighing and prognostic of 1-RM, warm-up, and unilateral 1-RM test (at the flexor and extensor machine). After the test application, the data were analyzed and the mean values for the ratio between agonist/antagonist found were 52.34% (±9.72) for men and 43.19% (±5.82) for women (which were significantly different between groups). The values found in the present study may be used as reference for asymptomatic individuals with similar age.

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Utilização do teste de 1-RM na mensuração da razão entre flexores e extensores de joelho em adultos jovens

Américo

Souza

Guimarães

et al. 2011

“…Moreover, no statistically significant difference was verified in the comparison between the mean values obtained in 1-RM tests and the mean values estimated by the Brzycki equation from the application of submaximal tests of 7-10 RM (t = 0.47; P > 0.05). These results are very interesting, once the estimation of 1RM from these submaximal tests usually present correlation values fairly high (r > 0.90), the ESE reported in the majority of the studies has been higher or equal to 10% (12) .…”

Section: Workload Lifted Testsmentioning

confidence: 72%

Validação da equação de Brzycki para a estimativa de 1-RM no exercício supino em banco horizontal

Nascimento

Cyrino

Nakamura

et al. 2007

The aim of the present study was to analyze the validation of the equation proposed by Brzycki for the prediction of a maximum repetition (1-RM) in the bench press. Fifty sedentary or moderately active male subjects (22.2 ± 3.5 years; 64.7 ± 8.6 kg), were initially submitted to six test sessions of 1-RM in the bench press, with 48 hours of interval between each session, in order to determine the maximum workload. A protocol of force resistance was then performed for the determination of 7-10-RM. The used criteria for the validation included: t-Student test for dependent samples, for comparison among the mean values obtained by the predictive equation and by the 1-RM test; Pearson correlation coefficient for analysis of the association degree among the measurements; standard error of estimate (SEE) for evaluation of the mean deviation degree of the individual data along the produced line; total error (TE) for the verification of the mean deviation of the individual values of the identity line; constant error (CE) for analysis of the difference among the mean values obtained in the 1-RM test and predicted by the proposed equation. None statistically significant difference was verified among the values produced by the 1-RM test and the Brzycki equation (P > 0.05). Both the SEE and the TE were relatively low (2.42 kg or 3.4% and 1.55 kg or 2.2%, respectively), as well as the CE found (0.22 kg or 0.3%). Moreover, the correlation coefficient value found was extremely high (r = 0.99; P < 0.05), thus showing a strong association between the values found by the 1-RM test and the Brzycki equation. Therefore, the equation analyzed by this study satisfied the validation criteria established by the literature. The results suggest that the Brzycki equation seems to be a fairly attractive alternative for the estimation of 1-RM values in the bench press from the performance of submaximal tests of 7-10-RM, in sedentary or moderately active male adults.

“…The 10 repetition maximum test (10RM) application was chosen for presenting high correlation with the muscle strength assessed in 1RM (14) . The test was applied in alternation by segment in the following order: leg press 45º, bench press, leg extension and biceps curl.…”

Section: Muscle Strength Evaluation In 10rmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efeito das diferentes fases do ciclo menstrual no desempenho da força muscular em 10RM

Loureiro

Dias

Sales

et al. 2011

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the different phases of the menstrual cycle (MC) on muscular strength performance in resistance exercises. Nine healthy and physically active women, aged 27±7 yrs, body mass 58.2±5 kg, height 161.1±4.7 cm and BMI 20.4±2 kg/m2 participated in the study. All of them had regular MCs (28-31 days), used oral contraceptives and had been experienced in resistance exercises for at least eight months. Muscle strength was evaluated with a 10RM test in the following order: leg press 45º, bench press, leg extension and biceps curl. The tests were performed in the three phases of the MC: follicular (between the 3rd and 5th day of menses), ovulatory (between 9th and 10th days) and luteal (between 17th and 21th days). ANOVA for repeated measures was applied for statistical analysis, data were analyzed in the SPSS 15.0 and level of significance was set at 5% (p<0.05). No significant statistical differences were observed in the mobilized weight between the MC periods in those four exercises. Regarding the leg press exercise, a 5% increment in muscle strength was observed on the luteal phase. In the remaining exercises and phases these differences were not observed. In conclusion, the phases of the MC did not affect performance of muscular strength in resistance exercise, both single and multiple joint, for large or small muscle groups or in different body segments.