2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing a cue outside the training context increases attention to the contexts and impairs performance in human predictive learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is clear from these experiments that different types of instructions modulate context-switch effects, this study does not show independent evidence of instructions differentially modulating attention to contexts and cues. Further studies should include independent measures of attention, such as the ones provided by an eye-tracker (e.g., Aristizabal et al, 2016, 2017). At any rate, these interpretations do not compromise the conclusion of this experimental series that the role of contexts in retrieval of the information by human beings may be modulated by the instructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it is clear from these experiments that different types of instructions modulate context-switch effects, this study does not show independent evidence of instructions differentially modulating attention to contexts and cues. Further studies should include independent measures of attention, such as the ones provided by an eye-tracker (e.g., Aristizabal et al, 2016, 2017). At any rate, these interpretations do not compromise the conclusion of this experimental series that the role of contexts in retrieval of the information by human beings may be modulated by the instructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control group, Group Task, was requested to pay attention to the task, whereas the experimental group, Group Context, was requested to pay attention to the context. Placing the instructions four trials before testing was decided based on the results of León et al, who found that context-switch effects on performance in this specific task can be found after four training trials, suggesting that attention to redundant contexts is kept high at least up to the fourth training trial in this type of task (see also Aristizabal, Ramos-Álvarez, Callejas-Aguilera, & Rosas, 2016, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estas estimaciones se apoyaron adicionalmente en estudios previos de aprendizaje predictivo con diseños intrasujeto que han mostrado que, incluso una muestra inferior a la presentada es adecuada para identificar los efectos principales de cambio de contexto (Aristizabal et al, 2016(Aristizabal et al, , 2017León et al, 2011;Ogallar et al, 2019;Pearson & Le Pelley, 2020;Rosas & Callejas-Aguilera, 2006).…”
Section: Participantesunclassified
“…Siguiendo este razonamiento, el efecto de cambio de contexto no depende de las características de la información, sino de las características de la situación, la cual llevará a los participantes a prestar o no atención al contexto mientras se aprende la información (Aristizabal et al, 2016(Aristizabal et al, , 2017Bouton, 1997;Jiang & Leung, 2005;Larrauri & Schmajuk, 2008). Esta teoría considera dos factores moduladores de la atención al contexto; en primer lugar, la relevancia subjetiva del contexto determinada por su valor informativo (León et al, 2008(León et al, , 2010a(León et al, , 2010bLeón et al, 2011;Lucke et al, 2014;Uengoer et al, 2018), las instrucciones dadas a los participantes humanos (Callejas-Aguilera et al, 2019) y la saliencia del contexto respecto a las claves (Abad et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Context is present everywhere, and unquestionably influences the way information is processed in every situation [29][30][31]. While context is critical to information processing in all kinds of situations, it is almost fully absent from the modern information technology infrastructure.…”
Section: Context Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%