2020
DOI: 10.1002/acp.3747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing a modified cognitive interview with category clustering recall in Iran

Abstract: The cognitive interview (CI) has been an effective method for interviewing eyewitnesses often leading to changes in legislation and practice in many countries. This study was the first to employ the CI in Iran and test whether category clustering recall (CCR) was superior to a free recall when incorporated within an investigative interview. A between-subjects design assigned 66 participants to one of three interview conditions after they watched a mock robbery. The participants were interviewed 48 hr later usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CI superiority effect also has been replicated in countries with different cultural backgrounds, e.g. USA, UK, Portugal, Brazil, and Iran (Paulo et al, 2015;Stein and Memon, 2006;Shahvaroughi et al, 2021). Moreover, the CI and its components have been widely used by many police forces to collect eyewitness accounts (Dando et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The CI superiority effect also has been replicated in countries with different cultural backgrounds, e.g. USA, UK, Portugal, Brazil, and Iran (Paulo et al, 2015;Stein and Memon, 2006;Shahvaroughi et al, 2021). Moreover, the CI and its components have been widely used by many police forces to collect eyewitness accounts (Dando et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The research aims to get to know the effect to debate activity after conducted in speaking learning process. Interview (Shahvaroughi et al 2021) stated, the interview includes different ingredients, mnemonics, and instructions, which may not always have the same level of efficacy.…”
Section: Document Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies have examined whether particular investigative interview techniques ‘work’ in different cultures, most of this research reflects limited comparisons of a particular technique with little or no adaptation of the technique to take account of any cultural factors. For example, there are a number of studies examining whether the cognitive interview (CI) ‘works’ in developing countries (Stein & Memon, 2006) or with Arabs in Israel (El Asam & Samara, 2015), but these and other similar studies have typically applied the standard CI protocol with little or no adaptation (although see Shahvaroughi et al, 2020). The same critique is applicable to research where tools and techniques are simply translated for use in other contexts (e.g., NICHD; for a similar argument, see Katz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%