2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03764.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing cometary ejection models to fit the 1999 Leonids and to predict future showers

Abstract: Brown & Jones have discussed four models for the ejection velocities of cometary material during the perihelion passage of a comet. The ejection velocities depend on the heliocentric distance, density and mass of the ejected particle and on the size of the comet. For the density of the particles, they assumed three values, 100, 800 and 4000 kg m−3, which give a possible combination of 12 cometary ejection models. This paper tests whether these models can be applied to explain the Leonid phenomenon for which Co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total integration time is about 30 cometary perihelion returns, making in total 7 × 10 6 simulated particles. This is comparable to the Perseid study done by Brown & Jones (1995), and represents much more particles than in the simulations of McNaught & Asher (1999); Göckel & Jehn (2000); Lyytinen & Van Flandern (2000) and Messenger (2002). The two other parameters of Eq.…”
Section: Technical Details Of the Simulationsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The total integration time is about 30 cometary perihelion returns, making in total 7 × 10 6 simulated particles. This is comparable to the Perseid study done by Brown & Jones (1995), and represents much more particles than in the simulations of McNaught & Asher (1999); Göckel & Jehn (2000); Lyytinen & Van Flandern (2000) and Messenger (2002). The two other parameters of Eq.…”
Section: Technical Details Of the Simulationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Note that this model is not "Crifo (1995)'s model" quoted by Brown & Jones (1998) or Göckel & Jehn (2000). However, this model is closer to the classical "dirty snowball" (Whipple 1950) view of a cometary nucleus.…”
Section: Terminal Velocity Of Dust Particles Ejected By the Cometmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations