2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2019)095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing electroweak SUSY for muon g − 2 and dark matter at the LHC and beyond

Abstract: Given that the LHC experiment has produced strong constraints on the colored supersymmetric particles (sparticles), testing the electroweak supersymmetry (EWSUSY) will be the next crucial task at the LHC. On the other hand, the light electroweakinos and sleptons in the EWSUSY can also contribute to the dark matter (DM) and low energy lepton observables. The precision measurements of them will provide the indirect evidence of SUSY. In this work, we confront the EWSUSY with the muon g − 2 anomaly, the DM relic d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LHC Run II data, the (then) current bound from (g−2) μ as well as DM constraints were analyzed in several benchmark planes in [26][27][28] and in two benchmark scenarios w.r.t. the DM relic abundance in [29]. In the latter the relevant LHC searches have been applied without a proper re-casting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LHC Run II data, the (then) current bound from (g−2) μ as well as DM constraints were analyzed in several benchmark planes in [26][27][28] and in two benchmark scenarios w.r.t. the DM relic abundance in [29]. In the latter the relevant LHC searches have been applied without a proper re-casting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, unification in the down sector as in the classical Georgi-Jarslkog scheme demands |y τ /y b | GUT = 1 and |y µ /y s | GUT = k GJ = 3. However, nowadays, these relations are no longer favoured phenomenologically [73][74][75][76] but the updated range 11) obtained in [75]. This is the reason we take to generalize our k GJ factor to k GJ = B−L+κT 3 .…”
Section: Supersymmetric Type-i Seesawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…remains an interesting motivation to explore new models [9][10][11][12][13][14], for a review see [15]. 1 With respect to neutrino masses, the type-I seesaw mechanism [19][20][21][22][23][24] seems to be the most natural extension of the SM to generate them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In all the aforementioned models, flavor violation is suppressed, cosmology is consistent, and the predicted SM Higgs boson mass can easily match the measured one. (See also other early SUSY models explaining the g − 2 [31][32][33][34][35][36])…”
Section: Jhep06(2021)029mentioning
confidence: 99%