2012
DOI: 10.2478/s11600-012-0013-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing fractal coefficients sensitivity on real and simulated earthquake data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here L denotes the number of layers. In our work, we consider the set of sites only in the last layer to find its fractal dimension as [49]…”
Section: Modeling Heterogeneous Population Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here L denotes the number of layers. In our work, we consider the set of sites only in the last layer to find its fractal dimension as [49]…”
Section: Modeling Heterogeneous Population Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fractal approach has introduced a new statistical tool to quantify the scale invariant distribution of seismicity and, with that, the properties of randomness and clusterization. Time variations of the spatial fractal dimension of seismic events have been found for different areas in the world allowing a quantitative characterisation over time of scale invariant failure processes acting in seismogenic volumes/fault zones (Lomnitz-Adler 1992, De Rubeis et al 1993, Öncel et al 1996, Tosi 1998, Xu and Burton 1999, Gospodinov et al 2012). The method often preferred for calculating the fractal dimension D on timespatial earthquake sequences is the correlation integral method (Grassberger and Procaccia 1983).…”
Section: Previous Studies On Spatial Clustering Of Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%