2012
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing goodness of fit of parametric models for censored data

Abstract: A goodness-of-fit test for left-, right-and interval-censored data, assuming random censorship is proposed and studied. In the first step of the test, the null model is extended to a series of nested alternative models for censored data as in Zhang and Davidian (2008). Then a modified AIC model selection is used to select the best model to describe the data. If a model with one or more extra parameters is selected, then the null hypothesis is rejected. This new goodness-of-fit test procedure is based on the or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first approach used values generated by the laboratory instrument, and observations that were reported as zero were replaced by one-half the next smallest value (other than zero) for that contaminant. In the second approach, censoring methods were used by applying survival analysis techniques to left-censored data that have been demonstrated by other authors ( Helsel 2012 ; Nysen et al 2012 ) to improve estimation and reduce bias. To account for nondetects, the geometric mean (GM) from a lognormal random variable with censoring was calculated using the maximum likelihood method (MLE) and compared with the empirical median from the Kaplan-Meier approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach used values generated by the laboratory instrument, and observations that were reported as zero were replaced by one-half the next smallest value (other than zero) for that contaminant. In the second approach, censoring methods were used by applying survival analysis techniques to left-censored data that have been demonstrated by other authors ( Helsel 2012 ; Nysen et al 2012 ) to improve estimation and reduce bias. To account for nondetects, the geometric mean (GM) from a lognormal random variable with censoring was calculated using the maximum likelihood method (MLE) and compared with the empirical median from the Kaplan-Meier approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the chi-square and the K-S goodness-of-fit tests, the test statistical values between the theoretical data derived from the probability density function or the cumulative distribution curve and the sample data can be calculated. The distribution type that has a test statistical value smaller than the critical value (significance level is equal to 0.05) is selected (Haan, 2002;Nysen et al, 2012). More than one distribution type can be accepted by the chi-square and K-S goodnessof-fit tests.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details on the SemiNP series, see Zhang and Davidian (); Nysen et al. (, ). We are interested in the SemiNP representation as a framework to model distributions of data such as the Cadmium data, where censoring is typically located in the left tail of the distribution.…”
Section: Application To Data and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the true unknown density lies in a broad class whose elements may be approximated by the SemiNP density estimator, tailored to provide an excellent approximation to virtually any plausible density. For more details on the SemiNP series, see Zhang and Davidian (2008); Nysen et al (2012Nysen et al ( , 2014. We are interested in the SemiNP representation as a framework to model distributions of data such as the Cadmium data, where censoring is typically located in the left tail of the distribution.…”
Section: The Family M Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation