2007
DOI: 10.1086/511175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Models of Radio Galaxy Evolution and the Cosmological Impact of FR II Radio Galaxies

Abstract: We investigate aspects of the cosmological evolution of FR II radio galaxies, focusing first on the abilities of models to match data for linear sizes, radio powers, redshifts, and spectral indices. Here we consider modifications to the theoretical models we had treated earlier, primarily by accounting for the growth of the radius of hot spots with source size. Better fits to the distributions of most of the data in three low-frequency surveys can be found with sensible choices of model parameters, but no mode… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(90 reference statements)
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…assuming more spherical sources. The question of volume filling factor of lobes is also addressed with more care in the works by Barai & Wiita (2007) and Barai (2008), with which the results of our work agree. The former paper investigates the volume filling factor by lobes using the models of Kaiser & Alexander (1997), Blundell et al (1999) and Manolakou & Kirk (2002), and also modifications by incorporating a variable hotspot size growing with the source age.…”
Section: Volume Filling Factor Of the Universe By Lobessupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…assuming more spherical sources. The question of volume filling factor of lobes is also addressed with more care in the works by Barai & Wiita (2007) and Barai (2008), with which the results of our work agree. The former paper investigates the volume filling factor by lobes using the models of Kaiser & Alexander (1997), Blundell et al (1999) and Manolakou & Kirk (2002), and also modifications by incorporating a variable hotspot size growing with the source age.…”
Section: Volume Filling Factor Of the Universe By Lobessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The relative contribution from FR I sources during the quasar era, for example to the volume filling factor, is modest. The volume of a typical FR I will be much smaller than the volume of an FR II source, since FR I seems to have a much higher efficiency in converting jet thrust to radio flux and are also much dimmer (see Barai & Wiita 2007 and references therein). In assessing the importance of FR I objects to the CXB, the question at hand is the integrated number of γ≃ 10 3 particles that the FR I produces during its lifetime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the probability of recurring semimajor mergers, each causing a large spin-flip is quite small, in that the temporal interval between them certainly is > 1 Gyr for semi-major mergers with mass ratios > 1 : 30 and even longer for major mergers (Z. Lippai, private communication, based on the merger tree program in Lippai et al 2009). Whereas, if jets are restarted while the earlier lobes are still visible, then it is likely that they have done so within ∼ 10 8 yr of the launch of the original jets, since visible radio activity seldom lasts much longer than that (e.g., Blundell & Rawlings 1999;Gopal-Krishna & Wiita 2001;Barai & Wiita 2007;Kaiser & Best 2007). In this way, the situations where the incipient inner lobe pair is essentially aligned with the (outer) primary lobes, as shown for a few XRGs (SS09), can be explained naturally.…”
Section: Appendix A: the Expected Mass Ratio Of Merging Smbhs And Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lifetime of 5 × 10 8 yr has been used in theoretical modeling of radio galaxies by Blundell et al (1999) and Barai & Wiita (2007). Observations of X-ray activity in the AGN (Barger et al 2001), SDSS optical studies of active galaxies (Miller et al 2003), and BH demographics arguments (e.g., Marconi et al 2004) all support an AGN activity lifetime of ∼ 10 8 yr or more (see also McLure & Dunlop 2004).…”
Section: Agn Lifetimementioning
confidence: 99%