Proceedings of Annual Symposium on Fault Tolerant Computing
DOI: 10.1109/ftcs.1996.534626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing of fault-tolerant and real-time distributed systems via protocol fault injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
10

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
32
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Perturbation, repeatability, monitoring-time resolution, controllability are recognized as some of the most significant properties for fault injection tools [10], [11], [12], [13]; while designing both fault injection tools and experiments, typically relevant efforts are spent to properly address them. As examples in the field of SWIFI, we briefly mention the tools ORCHESTRA [14], XCEPTION [15] and LOKI [16] and an experiment [17] performed using the FTAPE tool.…”
Section: Guidelines and Good Practices For Swifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perturbation, repeatability, monitoring-time resolution, controllability are recognized as some of the most significant properties for fault injection tools [10], [11], [12], [13]; while designing both fault injection tools and experiments, typically relevant efforts are spent to properly address them. As examples in the field of SWIFI, we briefly mention the tools ORCHESTRA [14], XCEPTION [15] and LOKI [16] and an experiment [17] performed using the FTAPE tool.…”
Section: Guidelines and Good Practices For Swifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ManyS WIFI tools target distributed systems [19,7,8,6] butd on ot use virtualization. Such tools do not, by themselves, provide a solution to the problem of unattended operation of campaigns that require node reboots.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of fault injection to test distributed systems [19,7,8,6] and leveraging virtualization for fault injection [2,3,18,16,9,12] have been presented in previous works. However, unique features of our work include: A) a comprehensive presentation of all aspects of a practical testing infrastructure, and B) ad etailed case study of the use of the infrastructure to validate a system with multiple advanced fault tolerance features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ORCHESTRA [Dawson et al 1996a, Dawson et al 1996b] se ha desarrollado en la Universidad de Michigan, para su aplicación a sistemas distribuidos en tiempo real. ORCHESTRA se implementa como un inyector de fallos a nivel de protocolo, instalándolo entre dos capas del protocolo de comunicaciones.…”
Section: Inyección De Fallos Implementada Mediante Softwareunclassified
“…La misión de esta nueva capa de inyección de fallos (Protocol Fault Injector -PFI-layer) es interceptar y manipular los mensajes que pasan a su través. En [Dawson et al 1996a, Dawson et al 1996b] se muestran los resultados de la aplicación de ORCHESTRA a dos sistemas (protocolos): una aplicación de video-conferencia en tiempo real sobre Real-Time Mach y servicio de pertenencia a grupo sobre un sistema operativo Sun Solaris.…”
Section: Inyección De Fallos Implementada Mediante Softwareunclassified