Testing of fine motor skills in dental students

Luck, Olaf; Reitemeier, Bernd; Scheuch, K

doi:10.1034/j.1600-0579.2000.040103.x

Cited by 48 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This fi nding is very important and in agreement with those of Gansky, 4 Luck 26 and de Andres 27 who feel that manual dexterity can be educated and improved by means of exercise and that tests to assess manual dexterity should be mainly used for identifying those subjects in need of a more careful, attentive and monitored …”

Section: Although This Study Was Not Intended To Describe a New Type supporting

confidence: 71%

Is manual dexterity essential in the selection of dental students?

Giuliani¹,

Lajolo

Clemente³

et al. 2007

Br Dent J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether basic manual dexterity (BMD) could be an important parameter in selecting students for the Degree in Dentistry (CLOPD) and to assess whether initial manual dexterity in students admitted to the CLOPD can improve with training in pre-clinical and clinical practice. Design Observational study. Setting The study was carried out at the Catholic University of Rome, in five consecutive academic years. Subjects and methods Four hundred and thirty-three subjects (262 males and 171 females) were tested (10 different exercises) in fi ve consecutive years. Two retests were performed after three and five years respectively from the beginning of the experi mentation. Main outcome measures The scores of individual exercises were averaged for each candidate, assessing the mean value of basic manual dexterity score (BMDS). Results It was possible to observe some differences among candi dates coming from different types of high schools, since those having a prior university degree or a scientific high school degree proved better than those with classical or vocational high school qualifications (p < 0.05). A statistically signifi cant improvement of BMDS has been observed in students who attended the CLOPD for at least 32 months. Conclusions Data obtained revealed that basic manual dexterity is not essential in the selection of dental students. Students who could fol low training significantly improved in their manual ability.

show abstract

Section: Although This Study Was Not Intended To Describe a New Type supporting

confidence: 71%

Is manual dexterity essential in the selection of dental students?

Giuliani¹,

Lajolo

Clemente³

et al. 2007

Br Dent J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2,3,5,9,22 Rather than attempting to design another predictive test, the primary aim of this study was to establish whether dentists and dental students have problems with the interpretation of depth and distance. It is obvious that many did have significant problems.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1,7,8,10,11 Although it is acknowledged that manual dexterity is an essential and highly desirable quality for a dental student to possess, and studies have examined vision in dental populations, the number of studies that have examined interactions between manual dexterity and vision are few. 5,9,10 Good eyesight is essential to providing the best dental care for patients. 7,11 It is interesting that dentists and dental students as a group have been found to be recalcitrant regarding frequency of eye examinations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1,2 Consequently, there has been a strong focus on manual dexterity as a predictor for successful dental performance. [2][3][4][5][6] However, such research fails to recognize that competency within dentistry also requires good perceptual and visual skills, not only for gathering information, but more specifically for judging positions, distances, and the size of objects. 7,8 What is ignored by most predictive tests is that prospective dental students may have visual or interpretative defects that would make acquisition of manual skills and interpretation of instruction difficult.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Depth and Distance Perception of Dentists and Dental Students

Dimitrijevic¹,

Kahler²,

Evans³

et al. 2011

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYThe quality of work carried out by dentists is dependent, among other things, on experience, training, and manual dexterity. Historical focus on the latter as a predictor of dental performance has failed to recognize that dental competence also requires good perceptual and visual skills, not only for gathering information but also for judging positions, distances, and the size of objects and shapes. Most predictive tests ignore visual and interpretative deficiencies that could make individual acquisition of skills and interpretation of instructions difficult. Ability to estimate depth and distance, the manner in which students learn this ability, whether and how it can be taught, or whether there is an association among ability, stereopsis, and dental performance has not been thoroughly examined; nor has the perception that dental students fully understand verbal and written instruction relating to depth and distance. This study investigated the ability of dentists and dental students to estimate and reproduce small depths and distances and the relationship of this ability to stereopsis, dental experience, and student performance. A total of 163 undergraduate dental students from three year groups and 20 experienced dentists and specialists performed three tasks. A depth-perception task involved estimation of the depth of two sets (2-mm or 4-mm wide) of nine computer milled slots ranging in depth from 0.5 to 4.0 mm. A distance task involved estimation of the width of specially prepared printed square blocks. In a writing task, participants recorded distances across a printed line on separate sheets of paper. All tasks were conducted at set positions in custom-made transportable light boxes. Stereopsis and visual acuity were also measured. Ability to perform perceptual tasks varied enormously, with the level of accuracy dependent on the type of task and dental experience. Many students had considerable difficulty in estimating depth. Inexperienced students performed poorly. Most participants overestimated depth and distance estimation tasks, but underestimated when required to draw distances. Smaller depths and distances were easier to estimate than larger ones. All groups overestimated depth more in 4-mm-wide blocks than in 2-mm-wide blocks. There was no correlation found between depth and distance estimation and stereopsis scores or with the overall grades tested. This study highlights that some dentists and many dental students, particularly early in their course, have great difficulty in accurately gauging depths and distances. It is proposed that that this could impact significantly on a student's ability to interpret verbal and written preclinical instruction and could make the acquisition of manual skills and interpretation of clinical instruction difficult. Routine testing of all undergraduate dental students for perceptual and visual difficulties is recommended, so that those with difficulties can be identified and problems remedied, if possible, early in their course.

show abstract

“…6 However, studies have shown controversial results with regards to the professional success of the dental students. Predictive admission procedures reduce dropout rates, improve average academic performance and selectively exclude applicants who are unlikely to be successful later on.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlation between Handwriting, Drawing Skills and Dental Skills of Junior Dental Students

Al-Johany

AlShaafi²,

Bin-Shuwaish³

et al. 2011

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Learning fine motor skills is a pre-requisite for succeeding in dental practice and it is sometimes challenging for dental students. Most of the methods used in the selection process depend on evaluation of intellectual ability or structured interview while manual competence is not. However, no test on aptitude or manual dexterity is used as criteria. Objective:The purpose of the present study intended to evaluate the fine motor skills of beginning dental students which could in turn be used as a method of selection of students for the dental degree admission process. Materials and methods:A study was conducted among 71 second year dental students at College of Dentistry, King Saud University in Riyadh. A test composed of three parts, writing an answer for a question in four lines, drawing a picture of a smile and doing a class 1 amalgam preparation on a plastic molar tooth. The students were evaluated based on their handwriting, basic drawing skills and their skills in performing the tooth preparation by experts in each fields following certain criteria. Results:The results showed a significant correlation between writing and drawing skills and dental skills of the student with p < 0.001. Conclusions:The results of the current study support the use of the writing or drawing test as one of the test used for the applicants for dental school admission. However, the value given to such test in the selection of students needs further investigations and consensus.

show abstract

Testing of fine motor skills in dental students

Cited by 48 publications

References 5 publications

Is manual dexterity essential in the selection of dental students?

Is manual dexterity essential in the selection of dental students?

Depth and Distance Perception of Dentists and Dental Students

Correlation between Handwriting, Drawing Skills and Dental Skills of Junior Dental Students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About