“…The self-(in)compatibility of 68 cultivars is reported herein for the first time. The results in the remaining 23 cultivars have been compared with previous reports in which self-(in)compatibility was determined by the evaluation of the percentage of fruit set after self-pollinations in the field (Egea and Burgos, 1996 ; Rodrigo and Herrero, 1996 ; Burgos et al, 1997 ; Egea et al, 2010 ; Muñoz-Sanz et al, 2017 ) or by the observation of pollen tube growth in pistils after self- and cross-pollinations (Egea and Burgos, 1996 ; Rodrigo and Herrero, 1996 ; Egea et al, 2010 ; Milatovic et al, 2013a , b ). Thus, results herein agree with previous reports for “Canino,” “Corbato,” “Luizet,” “Mirlo Blanco,” “Mirlo Anaranjado,” “Mitger,” “Palsteyn,” “Paviot,” “Pepito del Rubio,” “Tadeo,” and “Tom Cot” as self-compatible, and also for “Bergarouge,” “Goldrich,” “Goldstrike,” “Harcot,” “Hargrand,” “Moniqui,” “Orangered,” “Pinkcot,” “Robada,” “Stark Early Orange,” “Stella,” “Sun Glo,” and “Veecot” as self-incompatible.…”