2013
DOI: 10.17221/219/2012-hortsci
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing of self-(in)compatibility in apricot cultivars from European breeding programmes

Abstract: Self-(in)compatibility was tested in 40 new apricot cultivars from European breeding programmes. Pollen-tube growth in pistils from laboratory pollinations was analysed using the fluorescence microscopy. Cultivars were considered self-compatible if at least one pollen tube reached the ovary in the majority of pistils. Cultivars were considered selfincompatible if the growth of pollen tubes in the style stopped along with formation of characteristic swellings. Of the examined cultivars, 18 were self-compatible … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide apricot germplasm was used for assay testing and validation, with the aim of including a wide genetic variability. Results were largely in agreement with genotypes/phenotypes reported in the literature, although some inconsistencies were observed ( Table 1 ): in the case of ‘Harleyne’, characterized by the S 3 /S 20 S-RNAase allele, the presence of the heterozygous SFB C allele is congruent with its well-known SC phenotype [ 35 ], suggesting the hypothesis of a linkage breaking between SFB C and S C in the S -locus haplotype of this accession; in ‘Dorada’, ‘Ladycot’ and ‘Mirlo Naranja’, a heterozygous SFB C allele was detected in contrast to the homozygous S C /S C genotype reported in the literature, probably due to problems with the amplification of the incompatible(s) S-RNAase allele(s) [ 14 ]; in ‘Pricia’, an SC cultivar heterozygous for the S C allele, the SFB C allele was not detected although these cultivars were heterozygous for m -HET genotype; in this case, an erroneous attribution of the cultivars or a sampling error could provide a possible explanation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A wide apricot germplasm was used for assay testing and validation, with the aim of including a wide genetic variability. Results were largely in agreement with genotypes/phenotypes reported in the literature, although some inconsistencies were observed ( Table 1 ): in the case of ‘Harleyne’, characterized by the S 3 /S 20 S-RNAase allele, the presence of the heterozygous SFB C allele is congruent with its well-known SC phenotype [ 35 ], suggesting the hypothesis of a linkage breaking between SFB C and S C in the S -locus haplotype of this accession; in ‘Dorada’, ‘Ladycot’ and ‘Mirlo Naranja’, a heterozygous SFB C allele was detected in contrast to the homozygous S C /S C genotype reported in the literature, probably due to problems with the amplification of the incompatible(s) S-RNAase allele(s) [ 14 ]; in ‘Pricia’, an SC cultivar heterozygous for the S C allele, the SFB C allele was not detected although these cultivars were heterozygous for m -HET genotype; in this case, an erroneous attribution of the cultivars or a sampling error could provide a possible explanation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The self-(in)compatibility of 68 cultivars is reported herein for the first time. The results in the remaining 23 cultivars have been compared with previous reports in which self-(in)compatibility was determined by the evaluation of the percentage of fruit set after self-pollinations in the field (Egea and Burgos, 1996 ; Rodrigo and Herrero, 1996 ; Burgos et al, 1997 ; Egea et al, 2010 ; Muñoz-Sanz et al, 2017 ) or by the observation of pollen tube growth in pistils after self- and cross-pollinations (Egea and Burgos, 1996 ; Rodrigo and Herrero, 1996 ; Egea et al, 2010 ; Milatovic et al, 2013a , b ). Thus, results herein agree with previous reports for “Canino,” “Corbato,” “Luizet,” “Mirlo Blanco,” “Mirlo Anaranjado,” “Mitger,” “Palsteyn,” “Paviot,” “Pepito del Rubio,” “Tadeo,” and “Tom Cot” as self-compatible, and also for “Bergarouge,” “Goldrich,” “Goldstrike,” “Harcot,” “Hargrand,” “Moniqui,” “Orangered,” “Pinkcot,” “Robada,” “Stark Early Orange,” “Stella,” “Sun Glo,” and “Veecot” as self-incompatible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports show that pollination compatibility is an important factor affecting fruit set (Austin et al 1996;. Fruit set in the method of controlled pollination under field conditions has a disadvantage, which that the fruit set varies from year to year, depending on weather conditions (Milatović et al, 2010(Milatović et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Controlled Pollination In the Field (Cross Pollination)mentioning
confidence: 99%