2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09302-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Porter and pollution haven hypothesis via economic variables and CO2 emissions: a cross-country review with panel quantile regression method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
7
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These countries are: Angola, Argentina, Bangladesh, Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Chile, China, Columbia, Costa Rica, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominican Republic, Ivory Coast, Egypt, El Salvador, Equator, Gabon, Ghana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Republic of the Congo, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uruguay, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. In the estimation models, foreign direct investment (FDI) and trade openness (OPEN), which have been reported to have a strong relationship with CO2 emissions in various studies (e.g., Ren et al [2014], Shahbaz et al [2018], Huang et al [2019], Salehnia et al [2020], and Essandoh et al [2020]) were used as control variables. All variables were obtained from the World Development Indicators (WDI, 2018) database and used in logarithmic form.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These countries are: Angola, Argentina, Bangladesh, Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Chile, China, Columbia, Costa Rica, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominican Republic, Ivory Coast, Egypt, El Salvador, Equator, Gabon, Ghana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Republic of the Congo, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uruguay, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. In the estimation models, foreign direct investment (FDI) and trade openness (OPEN), which have been reported to have a strong relationship with CO2 emissions in various studies (e.g., Ren et al [2014], Shahbaz et al [2018], Huang et al [2019], Salehnia et al [2020], and Essandoh et al [2020]) were used as control variables. All variables were obtained from the World Development Indicators (WDI, 2018) database and used in logarithmic form.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past literature suggests that a firm's location is influenced by environmental considerations and project viability (Cheng, Hong & Yang, 2018). Likewise, there are inconsistent results related to the industrial flight hypothesis (IFH) (Blackman & Wu, 1998;Salehnia, Alavijeh & Salehnia, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gray growth can be intuitively recognized as growth contents that are not green, but it means more when considered in conjunction with the global reallocation of pollutive industries. This international dynamic pattern is mostly examined by the PHH (Neumayer 2001;Garsous and Kozluk 2017;Balsalobre-Lorente et al 2019;Salehnia et al 2020). The investigation of the cross-country predictions of the PHH and the EKC adjustment patterns has become more important with the consideration of the argument that the external costs of environmental problems can outweigh the internal benefits of economic growth.…”
Section: Conceptualization Of Green and Gray Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic formulation of the PHH associates a positive relationship between FDI inflows and environmental pollution and concludes that production within polluting industries will shift to developing countries with lax environmental regulation. However, the empirical part of the PHH literature is inconclusive 3 which revisits the Porter hypothesis which argues that stringent environmental regulations benefit firms (in developing countries) by fostering green innovation (Porter and van der Linde 1995;van Leeuwen and Mohnen 2017;Salehnia et al 2020). The Porter hypothesis can be linked to the pollution halo hypothesis which argues that FDI inflows transfer their greener technologies to host countries where, consequently, pollution-mitigating spillover effects occur (Balsalobre-Lorente et al 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Origins and Indicators Of Green And Gray Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation