2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2006)132:8(1183)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Protocol for Short Links in Eccentrically Braced Frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
85
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
85
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference is likely due to the web haunch plates located at the outer edges of the flange for the primary links, where the proof-of-concept test had a gusset at mid-width of the flange, away from the web-to-flange weld. Research by Richards and Uang (2003) indicated that the loading protocol for EBF links in the 2002 AISC Seismic Provisions is overly demanding in terms of the number of high rotation cycles it requires. As such, they proposed a new loading protocol that has been adopted in the 2005 AISC Seismic Provisions that more realistically represents the maximum rotation demand EBF links must sustain.…”
Section: Link Testing -Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference is likely due to the web haunch plates located at the outer edges of the flange for the primary links, where the proof-of-concept test had a gusset at mid-width of the flange, away from the web-to-flange weld. Research by Richards and Uang (2003) indicated that the loading protocol for EBF links in the 2002 AISC Seismic Provisions is overly demanding in terms of the number of high rotation cycles it requires. As such, they proposed a new loading protocol that has been adopted in the 2005 AISC Seismic Provisions that more realistically represents the maximum rotation demand EBF links must sustain.…”
Section: Link Testing -Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supplementary link with cross-section 2, Specimen AX2L1.6, was tested using the loading protocol specified in the recent 2005 AISC Seismic Provisions (AISC 2005). This protocol was developed by Richards and Uang (2003) considering tabulated cumulative plastic rotation and cumulative energy dissipation demand from various eccentrically braced frames subjected to many ground motions. The protocol requires more cycles at lower rotation levels and fewer cycles at larger rotations relative to the protocol of the 2002 Seismic Provisions.…”
Section: Link Testing -Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Large Magnitude-Short Distance (LMSR) bin caused the most critical structural response and was therefore utilized in subsequent studies which required a representative set of ordinary ground motion records. This included the work of Richards et al (Richards et al 2006) for the development of cyclic loading and testing protocol for eccentrically braced frames. LMSR earthquakes were defined as those with moment magnitude between 6.5 and 7.0 and distance from fault between 13km and 30km and included 20 records.…”
Section: Representative Crustal Earthquake Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, elastic out-of-plane slab stiffness outside the link regions may help reduce residual frame drifts, providing a kind of self-centering behavior. While several analytical studies have investigated seismic demands in EBF systems and components (Ricles and Popov, 1994;Richards and Uang, 2006;Richards, 2009;Kanvinde et al, 2012), the majority of these studies either neglect the concrete slabs or replace the concrete slabs by rigid-diaphragm constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%