2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13020299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Durability of Anti-Soiling Coatings for Solar Cover Glass by Outdoor Exposure in Denmark

Abstract: The presence of soiling on photovoltaic modules reduces light transmission through the front cover glass to the active absorber, thereby reducing efficiency and performance. Current soiling mitigation techniques are expensive and/or ineffective. However, anti-soiling coatings applied to the solar cover glass have the potential to reduce soiling for long periods of time without continuous maintenance. This paper reports the performance of two transparent hydrophobic coatings (A and B) exposed to the outdoor env… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed a loss of fluorine functionalization. These effects were previously observed in outdoor tests [18,26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also observed a loss of fluorine functionalization. These effects were previously observed in outdoor tests [18,26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We also observed heavy blistering on the surface of the thicker hydrophobic coatings during damp heat and UV exposure. This was also observed in outdoor testing [26]. There was evidence that the blistering was caused by retention of solvents within the bulk of the coating and inefficient curing after deposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CNC at this time was highly acidic. To make CNC acid free, the CNC suspension was centrifuged using a Virtuose PCF01 Lab Grade Centrifuge at 4000 rpm at room temperature (25°C) for 20 minutes, while replacing de-ionized distill water each at replacement batch until the pH was approximately 6.53 (~7) measured using a Measuretech PHS-3C digital pH meter [16,19]. To separate unreacted MCC in the suspension, a 0.22µm Whatman membrane filter was used in a vacuum filtration process using a Joan VT335, vacuum filtration apparatus [22].…”
Section: Preparation Of Cncmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to decrease in primary traits where the hydrophobic coating are used which makes the coating usable i.e. hydrophobic [6,7]. Economically, this becomes expensive as it needs to apply the coating periodically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%