Theory and Applications of Recent Robust Methods 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7958-3_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Equality of Location Parameters for Skewed Distributions Using S 1 with High Breakdown Robust Scale Estimators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose this criterion since it was widely used by most robust statistic researchers (e.g. Keselman et al, 2000;Othman et al, 2004;Syed Yahaya et al, 2004;Wilcox et al, 2000) to judge robustness. Nevertheless, for Guo and Luh (2000), if the empirical Type I error rate do not exceed the 0.075 level, it is considered robust.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose this criterion since it was widely used by most robust statistic researchers (e.g. Keselman et al, 2000;Othman et al, 2004;Syed Yahaya et al, 2004;Wilcox et al, 2000) to judge robustness. Nevertheless, for Guo and Luh (2000), if the empirical Type I error rate do not exceed the 0.075 level, it is considered robust.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S 1 statistic is a robust measure based on the difference of medians (Yahaya et al, 2004; Ahad et al, 2016; Babu et al, 1999; Hubert et al 2012), in this case the median of edge weights for a defined phenotypic group. S 1 statistics were computed using the NCI cancer research data commons cloud resource, the ISB-CGC, per tissue type.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified S 1 statistic, a robust measure of differences, can be used for comparing phenotypic groups (Babu et al, 1999;Yahaya et al, 2004;Hubert et al, 2012;Ahad et al, 2016). The modified forms of the S 1 statistic are shown to better control type 1 errors.…”
Section: Association Of Network Features and Survival-based Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%