2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Larson relations in massive clumps

Abstract: We tested the validity of the three Larson relations in a sample of 213 massive clumps selected from the Herschel Hi-GAL survey and combined with data from the MALT90 survey of 3mm emission lines. The clumps have been divided in 5 evolutionary stages to discuss the Larson relations also as function of evolution. We show that this ensemble does not follow the three Larson relations, regardless of clump evolutionary phase. A consequence of this breakdown is that the virial parameter α vir dependence with mass (a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
108
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(130 reference statements)
12
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to the comparison between σ and Σ, the final sample shows a rather weak correlation (ρ = 0.32, p-value < 0.01), while the sub-sample of clumps described above presents a stronger correlation (ρ = 0.62, p-value < 0.01). A similar correlation has been found in a separated sample of Hi-GAL sources in different evolutionary stages associated with N2H + (1 − 0) emission (Traficante et al 2018a).…”
Section: Non-thermal Motions Driven By Gravitational Collapsesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Similarly to the comparison between σ and Σ, the final sample shows a rather weak correlation (ρ = 0.32, p-value < 0.01), while the sub-sample of clumps described above presents a stronger correlation (ρ = 0.62, p-value < 0.01). A similar correlation has been found in a separated sample of Hi-GAL sources in different evolutionary stages associated with N2H + (1 − 0) emission (Traficante et al 2018a).…”
Section: Non-thermal Motions Driven By Gravitational Collapsesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the former scenario, we expect to observe a velocity dispersion-size relation, σ ∝ R δ , that resembles the turbulent cascade of energy when δ = 0.5 (Larson 1981;Heyer & Brunt 2004;McKee & Ostriker 2007;Federrath 2013). In Traficante et al (2018b) we have already discussed how this relation breaks down at the clump scales. We draw similar conclusions from our sample of objects, as shown in Figure 4, although our sample covers a limited range of radii.…”
Section: The Dynamics Of Star-forming Clumpsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We obtain surface densities Σ = M/(πR 2 ) in the range 0.006 Σ 0.07 g cm −2 . The uncertainties associated with each measurements are derived as in Traficante et al (2018b), that made an extensive analysis to evaluate the source of uncertainties for each parameter. A summary of the source parameters for all the 29 clumps used in this work are in Table 1.…”
Section: Clumps Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This happens because a high velocity dispersion does not only imply internal turbulence, but it can also be due to gravitational contraction. Therefore this criterion possibly excludes also collapsing cores (Traficante et al 2018). The effect is more pronounced in run M, where the cutoff affects many high-mass cores.…”
Section: Core Mass Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%