1997
DOI: 10.2307/281882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Reality of a “Living Floor” with Archaeological Data

Abstract: No matter how “pristine” an archaeological assemblage may appear, archaeologists should always be concerned with documenting the degree and nature of possible postdepositional disturbances. This paper outlines a number of tests that can be applied to archaeological, vs. geological, data to assess these effects, and their use is illustrated in an excavation of a Lower Paleolithic site in France. Although this site was originally thought to contain a possible “living floor” reflecting relatively little postdepos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
10

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
72
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in the densely packed lower level we cannot discount bioturbation or other disturbance factors associated with lag deposits. As has been previously noted (e.g., Dibble et al 1997;Richardson 1992;Villa 1982), even on sites with supposedly distinct stratigraphic layering this should not be taken as a guarantee that artifacts have remained fixed in their original locations. Fortunately, at site manufacture of tools, could be examined.…”
Section: Extent Of Post-depositional Movementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Even in the densely packed lower level we cannot discount bioturbation or other disturbance factors associated with lag deposits. As has been previously noted (e.g., Dibble et al 1997;Richardson 1992;Villa 1982), even on sites with supposedly distinct stratigraphic layering this should not be taken as a guarantee that artifacts have remained fixed in their original locations. Fortunately, at site manufacture of tools, could be examined.…”
Section: Extent Of Post-depositional Movementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Many researchers question the untested assumption that sites of this age are generally in primary context or are "living floors" (Blumenschine & Peters, 1998;Burroni, Donahue, & Pollard, 2002;Dibble et al, 1997;Issac, 1967;Paddayya, 1987;Paddayya & Petraglia, 1993;Petraglia & Potts, 1994;Potts, Behrensmeyer, & Ditchfield, 1999;Schick, 1986;Schiffer, 1983Schiffer, , 1987Shea, 1999;Stern, 1994;Villa, 1982). For example, Dibble et al define a living floor as "a discrete and undisturbed occupation surface, in which the composition and spatial distribution of the artifacts, fauna, and features reflect primarily or exclusively the behaviors of the past inhabitants over a relatively restricted period of time" (Dibble et al, 1997:630).…”
Section: Background To Paleolithic Landscape Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller, lighter artifacts can be winnowed out from the rest of the assemblage by water transport and gravity. I calculated the percentage of artifact size in centimeters by analysis section to examine the frequency of smaller artifacts that remain in the assemblage (Dibble et al, 1997;Schick, 1986). Schick (1986) has shown experimentally that complete assemblages include a larger number of small artifacts with a decreasing number of larger artifacts.…”
Section: Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of dispersal in loess is the result of a low surface wind shear (because vegetation is usually present) also causing low impact energy of silt particles. Size sorting of artifacts and patterned long axis orientation are common indicators of artifact redeposition (Brown 1997;Dibble et al 1997).…”
Section: Site Formation and Destruction Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%