2017
DOI: 10.14256/jce.1878.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the shear strength of soft rock at different stages of laboratory simulated weathering

Abstract: Testing the shear strength of soft rock at different stages of laboratory simulated weatheringDetermination of the change in strength based on simulation of weathering process in laboratory conditions is described in the paper, using marl samples taken from flysch formations in the region of Dalmatia. The testing has revealed that the proposed weathering simulation in laboratory can be conducted within acceptable time frames. Because of the observed change of shear strength parameters as related to values corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 6, samples from location at km 22+850 (designated J-1) are the least susceptible to disintegration, whereas samples from location at km 30+200 (designated J-3) exhibit the highest level of susceptibility to disintegration. Grain size curves for samples J-1(7), J-2(12), J-3(2), and J-3 (5) are shown in Figure 10.a to 10.d. It can be seen that the highest rate of disintegration is achieved during the first five month of exposure, whereas disintegration between 9 and 12 months of exposure is insignificant.…”
Section: Disintegration Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 6, samples from location at km 22+850 (designated J-1) are the least susceptible to disintegration, whereas samples from location at km 30+200 (designated J-3) exhibit the highest level of susceptibility to disintegration. Grain size curves for samples J-1(7), J-2(12), J-3(2), and J-3 (5) are shown in Figure 10.a to 10.d. It can be seen that the highest rate of disintegration is achieved during the first five month of exposure, whereas disintegration between 9 and 12 months of exposure is insignificant.…”
Section: Disintegration Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miščević and Vlastelica [4] emphasize that if cut slopes in flysch rock mass stay unprotected, the failures could develop within months after excavation. The influence of laboratory simulated weathering on the shear strength of marl was also studied [5]. Lithological factors such as the degree of cementation, existence of microcracks, grain size, heterogeneity, and mineralogical composition (type of clay minerals), have an influence on disintegration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, density and strength using the point load test were examined on the rock samples [28]. The point load test was selected as an index method, which is useful when the natural conditions of the samples impede the preparation of cylindrical samples [31,32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field estimates of uniaxial compressive strength of intact rocks (After [30], modified from [42]). Moreover, since soft rocks constitute transition materials between (hard) rocks and (stiff) soils, they are often too soft to be tested in rock mechanics apparatus and too hard for soil mechanics equipment [13,28,43]. Furthermore, they present numerous undesirable characteristics, such as low strength, disaggregation, presence of rock inclusions, capillarity suction, crumbling, high plasticity, slaking, and fast weathering [8,13,23,25,27,28,31,[44][45][46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%