2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of concrete-filled stainless steel tubular T-joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of force transfer mechanism between square CFDST under local bearing forces in this paper and other composite specimens under local bearing or locally axial loading, i.e., in [3,[16][17][18], are demonstrated in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Force Transfer Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparisons of force transfer mechanism between square CFDST under local bearing forces in this paper and other composite specimens under local bearing or locally axial loading, i.e., in [3,[16][17][18], are demonstrated in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Force Transfer Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The test results of square CFST under local bearing forces were presented in Yang et al [17]. Feng and Young [18][19] carried out the experimental and theoretical studies of concrete filled stainless steel tubular joints with square and rectangular brace and chord members subjected to compression. The performance and design calculations of rectangular CFST under local bearing forces were reported by Packer [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design rules in the CIDECT [3], which is the only existing design guideline for concrete-filled tubular joints do not include any definition of failure modes for concrete-filled tubular joints. The determination of failure load (N f ) proposed by Feng and Young [9] for concrete-filled stainless steel tubular T-joints is adopted in this study for concrete-filled stainless steel tubular X-joints. If the maximum test strength (N max ) at a deformation smaller than 3%b 0 , the maximum test strength is considered to be the failure load; if the maximum test strength (peak load) at a deformation larger than 3%b 0 , the test strength N 3%b0 at the deformation of 3%b 0 is considered to be the failure load.…”
Section: Definition Of Failure Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In transmission towers, poles and arch bridges [4], hollow or CFST chords and braces are commonly connected by welds. Previous investigations [5][6][7][8][9] demonstrated the radial stuffiness of chord member and the capacity of composite joints could be significantly improved when compared with the hollow section counterparts, despite that the inner concrete does not provide the direct tensile or compressive resistance to the external actions. The typical failure modes of composite joints were brace failure [5,6] and crushing of inner concrete [5,7] in the case of axial compression and punching shear in the case of axial tension [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%