1974
DOI: 10.1109/proc.1974.9508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of remote skywave measurement of ocean surface conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various investigators (Long and Trizna 1973;Tyler et al 1974;Stewart and Barnum 1975) suggested methods for inferring dominant wind/wave directions from first-order sea echo by postulating models for ocean-wave directionality about the mean wind direction. Algorithms for extracting wind speed were also postulated; Stewart and Barnum (1975) related the wind speed to the breadth of the dominant first-order line at a level 10 dB below the maximum, while Ahearn et al (1974) suggested the ratio of the first-order peaks to the continuum at zero Doppler shift as a wind speed parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various investigators (Long and Trizna 1973;Tyler et al 1974;Stewart and Barnum 1975) suggested methods for inferring dominant wind/wave directions from first-order sea echo by postulating models for ocean-wave directionality about the mean wind direction. Algorithms for extracting wind speed were also postulated; Stewart and Barnum (1975) related the wind speed to the breadth of the dominant first-order line at a level 10 dB below the maximum, while Ahearn et al (1974) suggested the ratio of the first-order peaks to the continuum at zero Doppler shift as a wind speed parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these ocean wave components respond rapidly to local wind excitation (characteristic response times of from minutes to a few hours) and also decay rapidly when the wind been essentially empirical, involving best fit relationships between various second-order parameters of the Doppler spectrum and winds measured in the scattering area, the assumption being that the particular spectral parameters chosen best represent, in some gross way, the 'state of development' of the sea, and hence the magnitude of the exciting wind. Parameters employed include (1) the decibel ratio of first-order to second-order spectral peaks [Barrick et al, 1974], (2) the decibel ratio of first-order peak to second-order continuum at zero Doppler frequency [Ahearn et al, 1974], and (3) breadth B of the principal first-order peak at a level 10 dB below the maximum [Stewart and Barnum, 1975]. Features of these various approaches are discussed in more detail by Sandham [1980] and Dexter [1981].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it seems likely (Crombie 1971;Barrick 1972b) that ionospheric Doppler shifts will normally be manifested as displacements of the first-order peak from its theoretical position, these must inevitably lead to the broadening of the Bragg peak and to uncertainties in the position and magnitude of the secondary spectral peaks as longer periods of data are included in deriving each spectrum. Attempts by Long and Trizna (1973) and Ahearn et al (1974) to overcome this problem have involved the use only of the two (positive and negative Doppler frequencies) first-order Bragg peaks and the neglect of higher-order details. This approach relies on empirical relationships which are themselves subject to considerable uncertainty, particularly for complex sea surface conditions.…”
Section: Theory and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%