“…Following to several other authors (Hild, 1978 ;Kleining, 1976 ;Hierholzer, 1977Hierholzer, , 1978, the proximal part was firmly clamped, the distal part loaded with weights The inclination a and the displacement x were measured with dial gauges We think these two parameters were more suitable for the determination of relevant movements within the fracture gap than the displacement measured on certain test-points as indicated by other authors Interfragmentary compression was recorded by an load cell developed for these particular measurements (Fig 6) By means of this load cell the load acting within the fracture could be measured at two areas of cross-section of the bone, so that the geometry of the inclination could be better realized than by point measuring By measuring a and x for various geometrical arrangements of the Steinmann pins and Schanz screws, the fracture movements calculated could be verified by mechanical testing. Following to several other authors (Hild, 1978 ;Kleining, 1976 ;Hierholzer, 1977Hierholzer, , 1978, the proximal part was firmly clamped, the distal part loaded with weights The inclination a and the displacement x were measured with dial gauges We think these two parameters were more suitable for the determination of relevant movements within the fracture gap than the displacement measured on certain test-points as indicated by other authors Interfragmentary compression was recorded by an load cell developed for these particular measurements (Fig 6) By means of this load cell the load acting within the fracture could be measured at two areas of cross-section of the bone, so that the geometry of the inclination could be better realized than by point measuring By measuring a and x for various geometrical arrangements of the Steinmann pins and Schanz screws, the fracture movements calculated could be verified by mechanical testing.…”