2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of the expectations hypothesis: Resolving the anomalies when the short-term rate is the federal funds rate

Abstract: The expectations hypothesis (EH) of the term structure plays an important role in the analysis of monetary policy, where shorter-term rates are assumed to be determined by the marketÕs expectation for the overnight federal funds rate. With two exceptions, tests using the effective federal funds rate as the short-term rate easily reject the EH. These exceptions are when the EH is tested over the nonborrowed reserve targeting period and when the test is performed only using data for settlement Wednesdays -the la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ORH is not supported by evidence in the United States. Poole, Rasche, and Thornton (2002) show that the coefficient on a surprise change in the Federal Reserve Board's federal funds rate target for long-term rates is much smaller than that for short-term rates. Moreover, for rates longer than 12 months the estimated response is not statistically significant.…”
Section: Implications Of the Rejection Of The Eh For Monetary Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ORH is not supported by evidence in the United States. Poole, Rasche, and Thornton (2002) show that the coefficient on a surprise change in the Federal Reserve Board's federal funds rate target for long-term rates is much smaller than that for short-term rates. Moreover, for rates longer than 12 months the estimated response is not statistically significant.…”
Section: Implications Of the Rejection Of The Eh For Monetary Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, our market data-based results might be seen as the corresponding upper bound. The mixed empirical evidence together with the empirical failure of the expectations theory (Sarno, Thornton, & Valente, 2007;Thornton, 2005) and the restrictive theoretical assumptions underlying preferred habitat (Thornton, 2012) imply that our understanding of how QE led to lower bond yields is still incomplete. For example, Gagnon, Raskin, Remache, and Sack (2011) and D'Amico, English, Lopez-Salido, and Nelson (2012) support a term-premium explanation, whereas Bauer and Rudebusch (2013) favour the signalling channel.…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section II presents the essential ingredients of the LM test proposed by Bekaert and Hodrick (2001). Section III briefly describes the data and preliminary unit root tests on our bond yields designed to 1 Moreover, Kool and Thornton (2004) and Thornton (2005) show how conventional tests may have generated misleading results in applied work. 2 In a previous draft of this paper, we used the data set used by Campbell and Shiller (1991) in their seminal work to see how the conclusions of the EH are affected by the test used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%