2020
DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2020.1834114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tetracaine from urethral ointment causes false positive amphetamine results by immunoassay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results infer that nearly 80% of the reported F/P AMP cases in urine samples obtained from emergency department patients could be attributed to tetracaine. This significant discovery underscores the necessity of considering potential drug interference during the interpretation of immunoassay results and unequivocally affirms tetracaine's interference in the CEDIA Amphetamine/Ecstasy IA [39].…”
Section: Local Anesthetic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These results infer that nearly 80% of the reported F/P AMP cases in urine samples obtained from emergency department patients could be attributed to tetracaine. This significant discovery underscores the necessity of considering potential drug interference during the interpretation of immunoassay results and unequivocally affirms tetracaine's interference in the CEDIA Amphetamine/Ecstasy IA [39].…”
Section: Local Anesthetic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Some new reagents or technologies may cross-react with other substances in the sample, leading to false positive results. 203 This can be particularly problematic in complex samples like blood or urine. In addition, some new reagents may bind non-specifically to LFA components, leading to false positives that can be difficult to detect and correct in the assay design.…”
Section: Challenges In Incorporating New Technologies and Reagents In...mentioning
confidence: 99%