1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf00416294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tetracyclin und Knochenkollagen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, in several groups the injection of HA particles in L5 led to a reduction of the parameters mineralized surface, mineral apposition rate, and/or bone formation rate compared to non-injected control vertebrae (Table 3). This is possibly due to a negative competition between endogenous bone HA and the injected HA particles for the binding of the injected fluorescent marker OTC, in line with previous reports showing competitive binding of therapeutically applied tetracycline and bone calcium to bone collagen [69].…”
Section: Biomechanical Testing (Compressive Strength)supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Interestingly, in several groups the injection of HA particles in L5 led to a reduction of the parameters mineralized surface, mineral apposition rate, and/or bone formation rate compared to non-injected control vertebrae (Table 3). This is possibly due to a negative competition between endogenous bone HA and the injected HA particles for the binding of the injected fluorescent marker OTC, in line with previous reports showing competitive binding of therapeutically applied tetracycline and bone calcium to bone collagen [69].…”
Section: Biomechanical Testing (Compressive Strength)supporting
confidence: 88%