1995
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00095-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tetraethylammonium effects on cochlear potentials in the guinea pig

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early work suggested outer hair cell sources predominate (Dallos and Cheatham, 1976) but later studies that removed inner hair cells in chinchillas showed a large effect on the CM (Zheng et al, 1997; Durrant et al, 1998). Furthermore, animal work in gerbils using the neurotoxin kainic acid recently showed a neural contribution to the SP (Forgues et al, 2014), which had also been reported previously using other species and compounds for blocking neural activity (van Emst et al, 1995; Sellick et al, 2003). In addition to the complexity of sources, the geometry between sources and recording sites will affect the polarity of the SP, contributing to complex changes across frequency and intensity as sites of generation within the cochlea shift.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early work suggested outer hair cell sources predominate (Dallos and Cheatham, 1976) but later studies that removed inner hair cells in chinchillas showed a large effect on the CM (Zheng et al, 1997; Durrant et al, 1998). Furthermore, animal work in gerbils using the neurotoxin kainic acid recently showed a neural contribution to the SP (Forgues et al, 2014), which had also been reported previously using other species and compounds for blocking neural activity (van Emst et al, 1995; Sellick et al, 2003). In addition to the complexity of sources, the geometry between sources and recording sites will affect the polarity of the SP, contributing to complex changes across frequency and intensity as sites of generation within the cochlea shift.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…These include the asymmetry in hair cell transduction, which is likely to different between inner and outer hair cells, which also differ in their membrane properties (Kros, 2007). The auditory nerve has also been shown to contribute to the SP in several studies (van Emst et al, 1995; Sellick et al, 2003; Forgues et al, 2014). For the auditory nerve, the DC is unlikely to be due to timing in PST, which, unlike the CAP and ANN is asynchronous to high frequencies and intensities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) and the compound action potential represent neural responses. The summating potential is most likely a signal consisting of hair cell as well as neural components Sellick et al, 2003;van Emst et al, 1995]. The portion of the ECoG signal which occurs after the compound action potential and lasts for the duration of the acoustic stimulus is called the ongoing ECoG response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, relatively recent studies ͑Durrant et van Emst et al, 1995van Emst et al, , 1996van Emst et al, , 1997Zheng et al, 1997͒ have focused on the role of the IHCs in the SP production. Although they used different species as experimental subjects, their results may provide an implication for the origin of the SP.…”
Section: Source: Ohc or Ihc Transducer?mentioning
confidence: 99%