Text Recycling in STEM Research: An Exploratory Investigation of Expert and Novice Beliefs and Attitudes

Moskovitz, Cary; Hall, Susanne

doi:10.1177/0047281620915434

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Registering a study in greater detail also speeds the writing of manuscripts from that study. The information from registrations can be repurposed ethically into manuscripts through developmental recycling (Moskovitz, 2021), particularly in method sections (Moskovitz & Hall, 2021), as the purposes of the registration and publication are distinct but require textual repetition to ensure fidelity to the meaning of the registration (Pieper et al, 2021). Researchers may be concerned that excessive disclosure will lead to their ideas being appropriated by other teams.…”

Section: The Registration Continuum As a Way Forwardmentioning

confidence: 99%

The registration continuum in personality disorder studies: Theory, rationale, and template.

Benning¹,

Smith²

2023

Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Registration is a tool to increase the rigor of personality disorder research and its ability to reduce human suffering through improving people's lives. This article details the problems that exist without registrations, which revolve around a study's outcomes' dependence on the data rather than on the theory being tested. Registrations exist on a continuum underpinned by bipolar timing and unipolar disclosure dimensions, the latter of which poses myriad points of decisions for researchers to register. The registration process provides memory aids and guideposts for researchers through the course of a study, transparently maintains public trust in the scientific enterprise, and preserves the severity of the tests used in the study. This article provides a template for personality disorder researchers to consider and examples of how researchers can use registered flexibility to plan for contingencies that might arise during a study. It also addresses challenges in evaluating registrations and implementing registration in a research workflow.

show abstract

Section: The Registration Continuum As a Way Forwardmentioning

confidence: 99%

The registration continuum in personality disorder studies: Theory, rationale, and template.

Benning¹,

Smith²

2023

Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, registering a study in greater detail will speed the writing of manuscripts from that study. The information from registrations can be repurposed ethically into manuscripts through developmental recycling (Moskovitz, 2021), particularly in method sections (Moskovitz & Hall, 2021), as the purposes of the registration and publication are distinct but require repetition of the text to ensure fidelity to the meaning of the registration (Pieper et al, 2021). Some researchers may be concerned that excessive disclosure will REGISTRATION CONTINUUM IN PERSONALTY DISORDER RESEARCH 6 lead to being to their ideas being appropriated by other research teams.…”

Section: The Registration Continuum As a Way Forwardmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Registration Continuum in Personality Disorder Studies: Theory, Rationale, and Template

Benning¹,

Smith²

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Registration is a tool to increase rigor of personality disorder research and its ability to reduce human suffering through improving people’s lives. This article details the problems that exist without registrations, which revolve around a study’s outcomes’ dependence on the data rather than on the theory being tested. Registrations exist on a continuum underpinned by bipolar timing and unipolar disclosure dimensions, the latter of which poses myriad points of decisions for researchers to register. The registration process provides memory aids and guideposts for researchers through the course of a study, transparently maintains public trust in the scientific enterprise, and preserves the severity of the tests used in the study. This articles provide a template for personality disorder researchers to consider and examples of how researchers can use registered flexibility to plan for contingencies that might arise during a study. It also addresses challenges in evaluating registrations and implementing registration in a research workflow.

show abstract

“…Not only is self-plagiarism not considered to be misconduct (including under U.S. federal law), but attitudes and beliefs about limited text recycling (as it is now known, because plagiarism is a pejorative term) have changed, thanks in large part to the excellent work of Cary Moskovitz and the Text Recycling Research Project. [42][43][44] In some circumstances, for example the above consideration of laboratory and clinical protocols, limited text recycling may be appropriate or even preferable. Anesthesiology now provides guidance to authors on how and when to use limited text recycling, specifically limited to describing research methods.…”

Section: Text Recyclingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Authorship and Publication Matters: Credit and Credibility

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A nesthesiology periodically updates our Instructions to Authors and communicates the changes broadly. This Editorial aims to provide brief summaries, background information, justifications, and applicability of the Journal policy updates, which are effective with this issue. These updates address the importance of recognizing the role of collaborators in research and mechanisms in Anesthesiology for doing so, qualifications for authorship in Anesthesiology, unacceptable types of authorship, salami publication versus appropriate use of segmented publication, acceptability of limited text recycling, and other elements of scientific integrity. Authorship: What Counts, Who Counts, Who Cares?Appropriate recognition for contributions to basic, clinical, and population research is an important aspect of scholarly publication. Anesthesiology strongly endorses the practice of appropriately crediting contributions to research publications toward the goals of giving proper recognition, fairness, and transparency for authors and readers, ensuring contemporary Journal best practices, and clarity of communication. Anesthesiology has for years provided multiple ways to offer appropriate credit on articles and communicate that credit through commensurate means of attribution and will continue to do so.What constitutes authorship is one of the most vexing problems in contemporary scholarly publishing, in part because there are no universal definitional standards of authorship. The sine qua non of authorship is a substantial intellectual contribution. Authorship denotes credit. Equally important is that authorship also denotes responsibility and accountability. Authorship credit and accountability are inseparable. Authorship is one form of credit, but other forms are more appropriate for work done that does not include all the necessary elements of authorship.Scholarly publications serve a dual purpose-one for which they were created and the other an unintended byproduct. The former is scientific communication, and the latter is use by institutions for assessment and reward. 1 Authorship is used in science to communicate research findings to peers and the public, denote credit and responsibility, document personal accomplishment, and advance careers, while it is used outside science by institutions whose interests often differ, such as for promotion and tenure processes, metrics of faculty productivity, and ranking institutional programs and reputations. 2,3 In both embodiments, communication and academia, authorship is "the currency of the political economy of scientific practice." 4 That primary currency of scientific credit ("coin of the realm") is reward assigned through peer Image: None (Journal icon).

show abstract

Text Recycling in STEM Research: An Exploratory Investigation of Expert and Novice Beliefs and Attitudes

Cited by 10 publications

References 20 publications

The registration continuum in personality disorder studies: Theory, rationale, and template.

The registration continuum in personality disorder studies: Theory, rationale, and template.

The Registration Continuum in Personality Disorder Studies: Theory, Rationale, and Template

Authorship and Publication Matters: Credit and Credibility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About