Text Selection in AR-HMD Using a Smartphone as an Input Device

Darbar, Rajkumar; Odicio-Vilchez, Joan; Lainé, Thibault; Prouzeau, Arnaud; Hachet, Martin

doi:10.1109/vrw52623.2021.00145

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In many of these examples, mobile devices expands and enriches the design space of interactions with HMDs. For example, we could leverage precise touch input of these devices to manipulate virtual objects [23,31,40,49], complement low-resolution 3D graphics with high-resolution screens [46], and support rich tangible and spatial manipulations [21,23,39,43]. Zhu and Grossman's BISHARE [58] synthesized many of these techniques and categorized them into phone-centric and HMD-centric interactions for 3D virtual object manipulation.…”

Section: Cross-device Interaction For Mixed Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

HoloTouch: Interacting with Mixed Reality Visualizations Through Smartphone Proxies

Neil

Willett

Suzuki

2023

Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Cross-device Interaction For Mixed Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

HoloTouch: Interacting with Mixed Reality Visualizations Through Smartphone Proxies

Neil

Willett

Suzuki

2023

Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The input speed of physical keyboards could reach 30 words per minute (WPM), with an accuracy rate of around 80% [ 11 ]. Touch screens and controllers offer better portability and typing speeds exceeding 8 WPM, but they are heavy and can detract from the user’s sense of immersion in the VR environment [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Additionally, some text input methods based on controllers involve a substantial learning cost.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study of the Typing Performance of Two Mid-Air Text Input Methods in Virtual Environments

Yue-yang

Wang

et al. 2023

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inputting text is a prevalent requirement among various virtual reality (VR) applications, including VR-based remote collaboration. In order to eliminate the need for complex rules and handheld devices for typing within virtual environments, researchers have proposed two mid-air input methods—the trace and tap methods. However, the specific impact of these input methods on performance in VR remains unknown. In this study, typing tasks were used to compare the performance, subjective report, and cognitive load of two mid-air input methods in VR. While the trace input method was more efficient and novel, it also entailed greater frustration and cognitive workload. Fortunately, the levels of frustration and cognitive load associated with the trace input method could be reduced to the same level as those of the tap input method via familiarity with VR. These findings could aid the design of virtual input methods, particularly for VR applications with varying text input demands.

show abstract

Usability of Cross-Device Interaction Interfaces for Augmented Reality in Physical Tasks

Zhang

Billinghurst

et al. 2022

International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Text Selection in AR-HMD Using a Smartphone as an Input Device

Cited by 8 publications

References 5 publications

HoloTouch: Interacting with Mixed Reality Visualizations Through Smartphone Proxies

HoloTouch: Interacting with Mixed Reality Visualizations Through Smartphone Proxies

A Comparative Study of the Typing Performance of Two Mid-Air Text Input Methods in Virtual Environments

Usability of Cross-Device Interaction Interfaces for Augmented Reality in Physical Tasks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About