2007
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-007-9226-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: out-of-plane cyclic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
132
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
132
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of the second layer of mortar was about 4 mm. The procedure for application of TRM is similar to the one carried out by Papanicolaou et al [1] and is graphically presented in Figure 2.…”
Section: Application Of the Reinforcing Mortar Overlaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thickness of the second layer of mortar was about 4 mm. The procedure for application of TRM is similar to the one carried out by Papanicolaou et al [1] and is graphically presented in Figure 2.…”
Section: Application Of the Reinforcing Mortar Overlaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution has proven to be effective on concrete structures but showed significant drawbacks when applied on masonry because of the use of organic resins as part of the FRP strengthening [1]. The most important issues are the hygrometric and mechanical incompatibilities between the masonry and the resin, the loss of strength of epoxy resins above the glass transition temperature and the toxicity of the materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of TRM in front of other possible strengthening solutions based on organic matrixes (e.g. Fibre Reinforced Polymer, FRP), have been reported in by Papanicolaou et al [6,7]. The main differences between these two strengthening systems arise from the organic/inorganic nature of the corresponding matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the drawbacks of this system (water vapour impermeability and insufficient mechanical compatibility with the masonry), which have been pointed out by several authors (see, for example the work by Baratta et al [13], or the articles by Papanicolaou et al [14,15]), FRP is still used for strengthening masonry structures because of its outstanding performance (justified in works like [11,12]) and the existence of consolidated guides and standards like [16,17]. In relation with the performance of the FRP, this strengthening technology is specially indicated for those interventions which require limiting the lateral deflection of the walls and look for a stiffer out-of-plane response of the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%