“…These interpretations are subject to further metalinguistic evaluations that influence language change and the ways speakers make ideological linkages between languages and other social entities, whether values, practices, objects, places, or historical eras. Such approaches have been especially widespread among linguistic anthropologists studying processes of language shift and language revitalization (e.g., Kulick 1992, Kroskrity 1993, Woolard 2004, Eisenlohr 2007, Errington 2008, Perrino 2011, Stasch 2011, Meek 2011. Irvine and Gal's work (2000) has been a foundational text for research stressing language ideology, introducing three macro-semiotic processes widely used in elucidating interactions over time among language ideologies, forms, and practices.…”